Illinois Compiled Statutes

710 ILCS 5/14 (2026)

Judgment on award

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(710 ILCS 5/14) (from Ch. 10, par. 114)
    Sec. 14. Judgment on award.) Upon the granting of an order confirming, modifying or correcting an award, judgment shall be entered in conformity therewith and be enforced as any other judgment. Costs of the application and of the proceedings subsequent thereto, and disbursements may be awarded by the court as to the court seems just.
(Source: P.A. 79-1361.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2023 · leading case: Int'l Fed'n of Prof'l & Technical Engineers, Local 153 v. Chicago Park Dist., 812 N.E.2d 407 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004).
Int'l Fed'n of Prof'l & Technical Engineers, Local 153 v. Chicago Park Dist., 812 N.E.2d 407 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). · cites it 2× “In the same motion, the Union also moved for attorney fees and costs under section 14 of the Uniform Arbitration Act (Arbitration Act) (710 ILCS 5/14 (West 2000)). The Park District filed a cross-motion for summary judgment on the ground that there was no genuine issue of fact…”
Negro Nest, LLC v. Mid-N. Mgmt., Inc., 839 N.E.2d 1083 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). “2d 407, 412 (2004) (absent specific language, “ ‘disbursements’ [(710 ILCS 5/14 (West 2000))]” cannot be interpreted to include attorney fees under the Arbitration Act); City of Chicago v.”
Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Pers. Staffing Grp., LLC, 2018 IL App (1st) 172281 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “710 ILCS 5/14 (West 2016) ; see Windham v.”
Dep't of Cent. Mgmt. Servs. v. Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. & Mun. Employees, 695 N.E.2d 444 (Ill. 1998). “710 ILCS 5/14 (West 1994). The record before us shows that these subsequent steps were never taken.”
KIM-C1, LLC v. Valent Biosciences Corp., 756 F. Supp. 2d 1258 (E.D. Cal. 2010). · cites it 4× “Under Illinois 710 ILCS 5/14, it is appropriate for Kim to be awarded additional attorney’s fees (to be determined in a subsequent motion).”
Cleeland v. Gilbert, 774 N.E.2d 821 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “The statute explicitly provides the court with the authority to confirm the arbitration award (710 ILCS 5/11 (West 2000)) and to enter a judgment on that award (710 ILCS 5/14 (West 2000)). Moreover, the power to appoint arbitrators is not limited to the appointment of…”
Radiant Star Enter., L.L.C. v. Metropolis Condo. Ass'n, 2018 IL App (1st) 171844 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “" 710 ILCS 5/14 (West 2014). Similarly, under the FAA, when a judgment is entered after an order confirming, modifying, or correcting an arbitration award, "[t]he judgment so entered shall have the same force and effect, in all respects, as, and be subject to all the provisions…”
Taxman v. First Illinois Bank of Evanston, 782 N.E.2d 803 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “When, as in this case, a motion to vacate an arbitration award is denied and no other motion to correct or modify the award is pending, the trial court is required to confirm the award (710 ILCS 5/12(d) (West 2000)) and enter judgment in conformity therewith (710 ILCS 5/14 (West…”
Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Pers. Staffing Grp., LLC, 2018 IL App (1st) 172281 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “710 ILCS 5/14 (West 2016); see Windham v.”
Fairfield Homes, Inc. v. Amrani, 2023 IL App (1st) 220973 (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “) 710 ILCS 5/14 (West 2020). ¶ 39 Because the statute affords the circuit court discretion, we will not disturb its decision absent an abuse of that discretion.”
Cerajewski v. Kunkle, 674 N.E.2d 57 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). “” 710 ILCS 5/14 (West 1992). Applying section 14, this court held that "the question of attorney’s fees is a matter peculiarly within the province of the trial court [citation], and absent a manifest abuse of discretion, the trial court’s decision will not be disturbed.”
Radiant Star Enter., L.L.C. v. Metropolis Condo. Ass'n, 2018 IL App (1st) 171844 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “” 710 ILCS 5/14 (West 2014). Similarly, under the FAA, when a judgment is entered after an order confirming, modifying, or correcting an arbitration award, “[t]he judgment so entered shall have the same force and effect, in all respects, as, and be subject to all the provisions…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.