Illinois Compiled Statutes
720 ILCS 5/12-11.1 (2026)
(Renumbered)
✓ current as of May 2026 Cite as: 720 ILCS 5/12-11.1 (2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(720 ILCS 5/12-11.1)
(from Ch. 38, par. 12-11.1)
(This Section was renumbered as Section 18-6 by P.A. 97-1108.) Sec. 12-11.1.
(Renumbered).
(Source: P.A. 86-1392. Renumbered by P.A. 97-1108, eff. 1-1-13.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases, 1996–2020 · leading case: People v. Reese
People v. Reese (2017)
“¶ 2 BACKGROUND ¶ 3 Defendant Willis Reese was charged with several offenses, including aggravated vehicular hijacking ( 720 ILCS 5/18-4(a)(3) (West 2006) ), vehicular invasion ( 720 ILCS 5/12-11.1 (West 2006) ), attempted armed robbery ( 720 ILCS 5/8-4, 18-2 (West 2006)), and…”
People v. Harvey (2004)
“Lyons Lyons was charged with vehicular invasion (720 ILCS 5/12-11.1 (West 1996)), aggravated battery (720 ILCS 5/12-4(b)(8) (West 1996)), intimidation (720 ILCS 5/12-6(a)(1) *188 (West 1996)), and unlawful restraint (720 ILCS 5/10-3 (West 1996)).”
People v. McCormick (2002)
“The elements of the two offenses are similar, except that vehicular invasion includes additional elements, namely, that the vehicle was occupied and the defendant entered by force. Because burglary of a motor vehicle is a "forcible felony," it logically follows that vehicular…”
People v. Doolan (2016)
“2009)), one count of vehicular invasion (720 ILCS 5/12-11.1(a) (West 2010)), and one count of aggravated battery “on or about a public way” (720 ILCS 5/12- 4(b)(8) (West Supp.”
People v. Reese (2015)
“720 ILCS 5/12-11.1 (West 2006). Defendant challenges only the evidence to prove that he entered the bus "by force," maintaining that his entry was not forceful, as he entered through the open door.”
People v. Doolan (2017)
“” 720 ILCS 5/12-11.1(a) (West 2010). ¶ 42 “Accountability is not a crime in and of itself but, rather, a mechanism through which a criminal conviction may result.”
People v. Melecio (2017)
“1 Unlawful Vehicular Invasi[on]" ( 720 ILCS 5/12-11.1 (West 2008) ). 3 Thus, the mittimus states that defendant was guilty of intentional murder rather than felony murder.”
People v. Austin (2014)
“1997)), two counts of home invasion (720 ILCS 5/12-11(a)(2) (West 1996)), two counts of residential burglary (720 ILCS 5/19-3 (West 1996)), one count of vehicular invasion (720 ILCS 5/12-11.1 (West 1996)), one count of unlawful restraint (720 ILCS 5/10-3 (West 1996)), and two…”
People v. Melecio (2018)
“1 Unlawful Vehicular Invasi[on]” (720 ILCS 5/12-11.1 (West 2008)).3 Thus, the mittimus states that defendant was guilty of intentional murder rather than felony murder.”
People v. Austin (2015)
“1997)), two counts of home invasion (720 ILCS 5/12-11(a)(2) (West 1996)), two counts of residential burglary (720 ILCS 5/19-3 (West 1996)), one count of vehicular invasion (720 ILCS 5/12-11.1 (West 1996)), one count of unlawful restraint (720 ILCS 5/10-3 (West 1996)), and two…”
People v. Lyons (2000)
“Lyons, guilty of vehicular invasion (720 ILCS 5/12-11.1 (West 1996)), aggravated battery (720 ILCS 5/12-4(b)(8) (West Supp.”
People v. Lewis (2015)
“OPINION ¶1 Following a jury trial, defendant Samuel Lewis was convicted of armed robbery (720 ILCS 5/18-2 (West 2010)) and unlawful vehicular invasion (720 ILCS 5/12-11.1 (West 2010)) and was sentenced to concurrent terms of 35 years’ and 9 years’ imprisonment.”
— 720 ILCS 5/12-11.1(a) — 5 cases
People v. Doolan (2016)
“2009)), one count of vehicular invasion (720 ILCS 5/12-11.1(a) (West 2010)), and one count of aggravated battery “on or about a public way” (720 ILCS 5/12- 4(b)(8) (West Supp.”
People v. Doolan (2017)
“” 720 ILCS 5/12-11.1(a) (West 2010). ¶ 42 “Accountability is not a crime in and of itself but, rather, a mechanism through which a criminal conviction may result.”
People v. McCormick (2002)
“The elements of the two offenses are similar, except that vehicular invasion includes additional elements, namely, that the vehicle was occupied and the defendant entered by force. Because burglary of a motor vehicle is a "forcible felony," it logically follows that vehicular…”
People v. Reese (2015)
“720 ILCS 5/12-11.1 (West 2006). Defendant challenges only the evidence to prove that he entered the bus "by force," maintaining that his entry was not forceful, as he entered through the open door.”
People v. McCormick (2002)
— 720 ILCS 5/12-11.1(b) — 4 cases
People v. McCormick (2002)
“The elements of the two offenses are similar, except that vehicular invasion includes additional elements, namely, that the vehicle was occupied and the defendant entered by force. Because burglary of a motor vehicle is a "forcible felony," it logically follows that vehicular…”
People v. Reese (2015)
“720 ILCS 5/12-11.1 (West 2006). Defendant challenges only the evidence to prove that he entered the bus "by force," maintaining that his entry was not forceful, as he entered through the open door.”
People v. Handy (1996)
People v. McCormick (2002)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|