ILCS » Chapter 725 · Act 207
Illinois Compiled Statutes

725 ILCS 207/65 (2026)

Petition for discharge; procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(725 ILCS 207/65)
    Sec. 65. Petition for discharge; procedure.
    (a)(1) If the Secretary determines at any time that a person committed under this Act is no longer a sexually violent person, the Secretary shall authorize the person to petition the committing court for discharge. If the evaluator on behalf of the Department recommends that the committed person is no longer a sexually violent person, then the Secretary or designee shall, within 30 days of receipt of the evaluator's report, file with the committing court notice of his or her determination whether or not to authorize the committed person to petition the committing court for discharge. The person shall file the petition with the court and serve a copy upon the Attorney General or the State's Attorney's office that filed the petition under subsection (a) of Section 15 of this Act, whichever is applicable. The court, upon receipt of the petition for discharge, shall order a hearing to be held as soon as practical after the date of receipt of the petition.
    (2) At a hearing under this subsection, the Attorney General or State's Attorney, whichever filed the original petition, shall represent the State. The State has the right to have the person evaluated by experts chosen by the State. The examination shall be conducted in conformance with the standards developed under the Sex Offender Management Board Act and by an evaluator licensed under the Sex Offender Evaluation and Treatment Provider Act. The committed person or the State may elect to have the hearing before a jury. The State has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the petitioner is still a sexually violent person.
    (3) If the court or jury is satisfied that the State has not met its burden of proof under paragraph (a)(2) of this Section, the petitioner shall be discharged from the custody or supervision of the Department. If the court is satisfied that the State has met its burden of proof under paragraph (a)(2), the court may proceed under Section 40 of this Act to determine whether to modify the petitioner's existing commitment order.
    (b)(1) A person may petition the committing court for discharge from custody or supervision without the Secretary's approval. At the time of an examination under subsection (a) of Section 55 of this Act, the Secretary shall provide the committed person with a written notice of the person's right to petition the court for discharge over the Secretary's objection. The notice shall contain a waiver of rights. The Secretary shall forward the notice and waiver form to the court with the report of the Department's examination under Section 55 of this Act. If the person does not affirmatively waive the right to petition, the court shall set a probable cause hearing to determine whether facts exist to believe that since the most recent periodic reexamination (or initial commitment, if there has not yet been a periodic reexamination), the condition of the committed person has so changed that he or she is no longer a sexually violent person. However, if a person has previously filed a petition for discharge without the Secretary's approval and the court determined, either upon review of the petition or following a hearing, that the person's petition was frivolous or that the person was still a sexually violent person, then the court shall deny any subsequent petition under this Section without a hearing unless the petition contains facts upon which a court could reasonably find that the condition of the person had so changed that a hearing was warranted. If a person does not file a petition for discharge, yet fails to waive the right to petition under this Section, then the probable cause hearing consists only of a review of the reexamination reports and arguments on behalf of the parties. The committed person has a right to have an attorney represent him or her at the probable cause hearing, but the person is not entitled to be present at the probable cause hearing. The probable cause hearing under this Section must be held as soon as practical after the filing of the reexamination report under Section 55 of this Act.
    (2) If the court determines at the probable cause hearing under paragraph (b)(1) of this Section that probable cause exists to believe that since the most recent periodic reexamination (or initial commitment, if there has not yet been a periodic reexamination), the condition of the committed person has so changed that he or she is no longer a sexually violent person, then the court shall set a hearing on the issue. At a hearing under this Section, the committed person is entitled to be present and to the benefit of the protections afforded to the person under Section 25 of this Act. The committed person or the State may elect to have a hearing under this Section before a jury. A verdict of a jury under this Section is not valid unless it is unanimous. The Attorney General or State's Attorney, whichever filed the original petition, shall represent the State at a hearing under this Section. The State has the right to have the committed person evaluated by experts chosen by the State. The examination shall be conducted in conformance with the standards developed under the Sex Offender Management Board Act and by an evaluator licensed under the Sex Offender Evaluation and Treatment Provider Act. At the hearing, the State has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the committed person is still a sexually violent person.
    (3) If the court or jury is satisfied that the State has not met its burden of proof under paragraph (b)(2) of this Section, the person shall be discharged from the custody or supervision of the Department. If the court or jury is satisfied that the State has met its burden of proof under paragraph (b)(2) of this Section, the court may proceed under Section 40 of this Act to determine whether to modify the person's existing commitment order.
    (c) This Section applies to petitions pending on the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 97th General Assembly and to petitions filed on or after that date. This provision is severable from the other provisions of this Section under Section 1.31 of the Statute on Statutes.
(Source: P.A. 97-1075, eff. 8-24-12; 97-1098, eff. 7-1-14 (see Section 5 of P.A. 98-612 for the effective date of P.A. 97-1098); 98-463, eff. 8-16-13.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 90 cases (20 in the last 5 years), 2000–2026 · leading case: People v. Botruff, 817 N.E.2d 463 (Ill. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Botruff, 817 N.E.2d 463 (Ill. 2004). · cites it 11× “3d 486 ), holding that: (1) section 25(e) of the Act (725 ILCS 207/25(e) (West 2000)), requiring a circuit court to appoint an independent evaluator upon an indigent respondent’s request, applies to postcommitment proceedings; and (2) section 65(b)(1) of the Act (725 ILCS…”
In re Det. of Stanbridge, 2012 IL 112337 (Ill. 2012). · cites it 8× “725 ILCS 207/65(a)(1) (West 2008). ¶ 51 The second mechanism for discharge is triggered whenever the committed individual undergoes one of the periodic examinations required by section 55 of the Act.”
People v. Trainor, 752 N.E.2d 1055 (Ill. 2001). · cites it 6× “725 ILCS 205/9 (West 1998); 725 ILCS 207/65 (West 1998). During the recovery hearing under the Sexually Violent Persons Act, the State must show by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is still sexually violent.”
In Re Det. of Samuelson, 727 N.E.2d 228 (Ill. 2000). · cites it 8× “725 ILCS 207/65(a) (West 1998). The second mechanism for discharge is triggered whenever the defendant undergoes one of the periodic examinations required by the statute.”
People v. Botruff, 771 N.E.2d 570 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 18× “725 ILCS 207/65(a)(1) (West 2000). The petition is then adjudicated at a hearing.”
In re Commitment of Wilcoxen, 2016 IL App (3d) 140359 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 6× “725 ILCS 207/65 (West 2008). ¶ 65 Here, Gaskell and Rosell assessed respondent's preparation for conditional release instead of discharge.”
In re Det. of Lieberman, 2011 IL App (1st) 90796 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). · cites it 9× “Respondent sought two alternative forms of relief: immediate discharge pursuant to section 65 of the Act (725 ILCS 207/65 (West 2008)); and conditional release pursuant to section 60 of the Act (725 ILCS 207/60 (West 2008)).”
People v. Ottinger, 775 N.E.2d 203 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 4× “Defendant argues that the trial court did not comply with section 65(b) of the Act (725 ILCS 207/65(b) (West 2000)). Section 65(b)(1) of the Act provides: “A person may petition the committing court for discharge from custody or supervision without the Secretary’s approval.”
In re Commitment of Kirst, 2015 IL App (2d) 140532 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). · cites it 4× “725 ILCS 207/65(b)(1) (West 2012). The notice must contain a waiver of rights.”
People v. Johnson, 870 N.E.2d 415 (Ill. 2007). · cites it 2× “Unlike the Sexually Dangerous Persons Act (see 725 ILCS 205/9 (West 2004)) and the Sexually Violent Persons Commitment Act (see 725 ILCS 207/65 (West 2004)), which expressly allow committed persons to file discharge petitions, section 11 does not provide that a registered person…”
In Re Det. of Cain, 931 N.E.2d 337 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 6× “"If the court determines at the probable cause hearing * * * that probable cause exists to believe that the committed person is no longer a sexually violent person, then the court shall set a hearing on the issue.”
In Re Det. of Cain, 792 N.E.2d 800 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). · cites it 3× “725 ILCS 207/65(b)(l) (West 2000). Whether or not probable cause exists to warrant a further evidentiary hearing is a matter resting in the sound discretion of the court.”
Show all 90 citing cases →
— 725 ILCS 207/65(2) — 1 case
In re The Commitment of Pieroni, 2024 IL App (1st) 230028-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2024).
— 725 ILCS 207/65(a) — 2 cases
In Re Det. of Samuelson, 727 N.E.2d 228 (Ill. 2000). “725 ILCS 207/65(a) (West 1998). The second mechanism for discharge is triggered whenever the defendant undergoes one of the periodic examinations required by the statute.”
In re Det. of Samuelson (Ill. 2000).
— 725 ILCS 207/65(a)(1) — 12 cases
In re Det. of Stanbridge, 2012 IL 112337 (Ill. 2012). “725 ILCS 207/65(a)(1) (West 2008). ¶ 51 The second mechanism for discharge is triggered whenever the committed individual undergoes one of the periodic examinations required by section 55 of the Act.”
People v. Botruff, 771 N.E.2d 570 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “725 ILCS 207/65(a)(1) (West 2000). The petition is then adjudicated at a hearing.”
People v. Steward, 940 N.E.2d 140 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
In re Det. of Lieberman, 2011 IL App (1st) 90796 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “Respondent sought two alternative forms of relief: immediate discharge pursuant to section 65 of the Act (725 ILCS 207/65 (West 2008)); and conditional release pursuant to section 60 of the Act (725 ILCS 207/60 (West 2008)).”
In Re Det. of Varner, 734 N.E.2d 226 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000).
— 725 ILCS 207/65(a)(2) — 7 cases
People v. Trainor, 752 N.E.2d 1055 (Ill. 2001). “725 ILCS 205/9 (West 1998); 725 ILCS 207/65 (West 1998). During the recovery hearing under the Sexually Violent Persons Act, the State must show by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is still sexually violent.”
People v. Masterson, 2011 IL 110072 (Ill. 2011).
People v. Steward, 940 N.E.2d 140 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
In Re Commitment of Bushong, 815 N.E.2d 103 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004).
People v. Masterson, 958 N.E.2d 686 (Ill. 2011).
— 725 ILCS 207/65(a)(3) — 1 case
In re Det. of King, 2016 IL App (1st) 150041 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
— 725 ILCS 207/65(a)(l) — 2 cases
People v. Botruff, 771 N.E.2d 570 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “725 ILCS 207/65(a)(1) (West 2000). The petition is then adjudicated at a hearing.”
White v. Phillips, 937 N.E.2d 786 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
— 725 ILCS 207/65(b) — 7 cases
People v. Ottinger, 775 N.E.2d 203 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “Defendant argues that the trial court did not comply with section 65(b) of the Act (725 ILCS 207/65(b) (West 2000)). Section 65(b)(1) of the Act provides: “A person may petition the committing court for discharge from custody or supervision without the Secretary’s approval.”
In Re Det. of Lieberman, 929 N.E.2d 616 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
In Re Commitment of Blakey, 904 N.E.2d 40 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
In re Commitment of Vance, 2017 IL App (3d) 160683 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017).
People v. Ottinger (Ill. App. Ct. 2002).
— 725 ILCS 207/65(b)(1) — 49 cases
In re Det. of Stanbridge, 2012 IL 112337 (Ill. 2012). “725 ILCS 207/65(a)(1) (West 2008). ¶ 51 The second mechanism for discharge is triggered whenever the committed individual undergoes one of the periodic examinations required by section 55 of the Act.”
In re Commitment of Wilcoxen, 2016 IL App (3d) 140359 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “725 ILCS 207/65 (West 2008). ¶ 65 Here, Gaskell and Rosell assessed respondent's preparation for conditional release instead of discharge.”
In re Det. of Lieberman, 2011 IL App (1st) 90796 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “Respondent sought two alternative forms of relief: immediate discharge pursuant to section 65 of the Act (725 ILCS 207/65 (West 2008)); and conditional release pursuant to section 60 of the Act (725 ILCS 207/60 (West 2008)).”
People v. Botruff, 771 N.E.2d 570 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “725 ILCS 207/65(a)(1) (West 2000). The petition is then adjudicated at a hearing.”
People v. Botruff, 817 N.E.2d 463 (Ill. 2004). “3d 486 ), holding that: (1) section 25(e) of the Act (725 ILCS 207/25(e) (West 2000)), requiring a circuit court to appoint an independent evaluator upon an indigent respondent’s request, applies to postcommitment proceedings; and (2) section 65(b)(1) of the Act (725 ILCS…”
— 725 ILCS 207/65(b)(2) — 47 cases
People v. Trainor, 752 N.E.2d 1055 (Ill. 2001). “725 ILCS 205/9 (West 1998); 725 ILCS 207/65 (West 1998). During the recovery hearing under the Sexually Violent Persons Act, the State must show by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is still sexually violent.”
In re Det. of Stanbridge, 2012 IL 112337 (Ill. 2012). “725 ILCS 207/65(a)(1) (West 2008). ¶ 51 The second mechanism for discharge is triggered whenever the committed individual undergoes one of the periodic examinations required by section 55 of the Act.”
In Re Det. of Cain, 931 N.E.2d 337 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “"If the court determines at the probable cause hearing * * * that probable cause exists to believe that the committed person is no longer a sexually violent person, then the court shall set a hearing on the issue.”
In Re Det. of Samuelson, 727 N.E.2d 228 (Ill. 2000). “725 ILCS 207/65(a) (West 1998). The second mechanism for discharge is triggered whenever the defendant undergoes one of the periodic examinations required by the statute.”
People v. Ottinger, 775 N.E.2d 203 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “Defendant argues that the trial court did not comply with section 65(b) of the Act (725 ILCS 207/65(b) (West 2000)). Section 65(b)(1) of the Act provides: “A person may petition the committing court for discharge from custody or supervision without the Secretary’s approval.”
— 725 ILCS 207/65(b)(3) — 5 cases
In Re Det. of Samuelson, 727 N.E.2d 228 (Ill. 2000). “725 ILCS 207/65(a) (West 1998). The second mechanism for discharge is triggered whenever the defendant undergoes one of the periodic examinations required by the statute.”
In Re Det. of Lieberman, 929 N.E.2d 616 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
In re Commitment of Rendon, 2021 IL App (1st) 190712-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021).
In re Det. of Lieberman (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
In re Det. of Samuelson (Ill. 2000).
— 725 ILCS 207/65(b)(l) — 8 cases
People v. Botruff, 817 N.E.2d 463 (Ill. 2004). “3d 486 ), holding that: (1) section 25(e) of the Act (725 ILCS 207/25(e) (West 2000)), requiring a circuit court to appoint an independent evaluator upon an indigent respondent’s request, applies to postcommitment proceedings; and (2) section 65(b)(1) of the Act (725 ILCS…”
In Re Det. of Cain, 792 N.E.2d 800 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “725 ILCS 207/65(b)(l) (West 2000). Whether or not probable cause exists to warrant a further evidentiary hearing is a matter resting in the sound discretion of the court.”
People v. Botruff, 771 N.E.2d 570 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “725 ILCS 207/65(a)(1) (West 2000). The petition is then adjudicated at a hearing.”
In Re Det. of Samuelson, 727 N.E.2d 228 (Ill. 2000). “725 ILCS 207/65(a) (West 1998). The second mechanism for discharge is triggered whenever the defendant undergoes one of the periodic examinations required by the statute.”
People v. Ottinger, 775 N.E.2d 203 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “Defendant argues that the trial court did not comply with section 65(b) of the Act (725 ILCS 207/65(b) (West 2000)). Section 65(b)(1) of the Act provides: “A person may petition the committing court for discharge from custody or supervision without the Secretary’s approval.”
— 725 ILCS 207/65(c) — 2 cases
In re Commitment of Rendon, 2017 IL App (1st) 153201 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017).
In re Commitment of Rendon, 2017 IL App (1st) 153201 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.