Illinois Compiled Statutes
725 ILCS 5/102-14 (2026)
"Judgment"
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(725 ILCS 5/102-14)
(from Ch. 38, par. 102-14)
Sec. 102-14.
"Judgment".
"Judgment" means an adjudication by the court that the defendant is
guilty or not guilty and if the adjudication is that the defendant is
guilty it includes the sentence pronounced by the court.
(Source: Laws 1963, p. 2836.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1999–2025 · leading case: People v. Mares, 2018 IL App (2d) 150565 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018).
People v. Mares, 2018 IL App (2d) 150565 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “According to section 102-14, " '[j]udgment' means an adjudication by the court that the defendant is guilty or not guilty and if the adjudication is that the defendant is guilty it includes the sentence pronounced by the court." Id. Defendant's argument, as we understand it, is…”
People v. Weiser, 2013 IL App (5th) 120055 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “38, ¶¶ 102-14, 1005-1-12 (now 725 ILCS 5/102-14 (West 2012) and 730 ILCS 5/5-1-12 (West 2012))).”
People v. Salem, 2016 IL App (3d) 120390 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “) 725 ILCS 5/102-14 (West 2010). Further, our supreme court has long established that the final judgment in a criminal case is the sentence (People v.”
People v. Clark, 2019 IL 122891 (Ill. 2019). “) 725 ILCS 5/102-14 (West 2014). ¶ 103 Nothing in the context of the escape statute suggests that the legislature intended to depart from the statutory definitions of the words “convicted” and “judgment,” and nothing suggests that the word “convicted” as used in the escape…”
People v. Clark, 2019 IL 122891 (Ill. 2019). “) 725 ILCS 5/102-14 (West 2014). ¶ 103 Nothing in the context of the escape statute suggests that the legislature intended to depart from the statutory definitions of the words “convicted” and “judgment,” and nothing suggests that the word “convicted” as used in the escape…”
People v. Lopez, 2023 IL App (4th) 220144-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “” 725 ILCS 5/102-14 (West 2020). ¶ 32 Here, defendant’s sentence was pronounced on June 29, 2021, two days before -7- the effective date of section (d)(1.”
People v. Costic, 2025 IL App (4th) 241041-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2025). “In reaching its conclusion, the Third District relied on (1) a section of the Criminal Code of 1961 defining a “conviction” (720 ILCS 5/2-5 (West 2010)) and a section of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 defining a “judgment” (725 ILCS 5/102-14 (West 2010)), (2) supreme…”
People v. Clark, 2019 IL 122891 (Ill. 2019). “) 725 ILCS 5/102-14 (West 2014). ¶ 103 Nothing in the context of the escape statute suggests that the legislature intended to depart from the statutory definitions of the words “convicted” and “judgment,” and nothing suggests that the word “convicted” as used in the escape…”
People v. Neal, 2024 IL App (4th) 230029-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “Section 102-14 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 defined a judgment as “an adjudication by the court that the defendant is guilty or not guilty and if the adjudication is that the defendant is guilty it includes the sentence pronounced by the court.”
People v. Mares, 2018 IL App (2d) 150565 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “¶9 As we understand defendant’s argument, both these propositions seem to flow from the definition of “judgment” set forth in section 102-14 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (the Code) (725 ILCS 5/102-14 (West 2014)). According to section 102-14, “ ‘[j]udgment’ means an…”
People v. Woods (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “See 725 ILCS 5/102-14 (West 1996). The final judgment in a criminal case is the imposition of sentence, which is a necessary part of a complete judgment of guilt, without which a judgment of conviction is not final.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|