Illinois Compiled Statutes

725 ILCS 5/108B-2 (2026)

Request for application for interception

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(725 ILCS 5/108B-2) (from Ch. 38, par. 108B-2)
    Sec. 108B-2. Request for application for interception.
    (a) A State's Attorney may apply for an order authorizing interception of private communications in accordance with the provisions of this Article.
    (b) The head of a law enforcement agency, including, for purposes of this subsection, the acting head of such law enforcement agency if the head of such agency is absent or unable to serve, may request that a State's Attorney apply for an order authorizing interception of private communications in accordance with the provisions of this Article.
    Upon request of a law enforcement agency, the Illinois State Police may provide technical assistance to such an agency which is authorized to conduct an interception.
(Source: P.A. 102-538, eff. 8-20-21.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2018–2024 · leading case: People v. Allard, 2018 IL App (2d) 160927 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018).
People v. Allard, 2018 IL App (2d) 160927 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 3× “" 725 ILCS 5/108B-2(a) (West 2014). The statute provides that "[a] State's Attorney may apply for an order authorizing interception of private communications in accordance with the provisions of this Article .”
People v. Spears, 2024 IL App (1st) 181491 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). · cites it 2× “” 725 ILCS 5/108B-2(a) (West 2012). Article 108B further states: “[t]he State’s Attorney, or a person designated in writing or by law to act for him and to perform his duties during his absence or disability, may authorize, in writing, an ex parte application to the chief judge…”
People v. Allard, 2018 IL App (2d) 160927 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “” 725 ILCS 5/108B-2 (West 2014). The statute provides that “[a] State’s Attorney may apply for an order authorizing interception of private communications in accordance with the provisions of this Article.”
— 725 ILCS 5/108B-2(a) — 3 cases
People v. Allard, 2018 IL App (2d) 160927 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “" 725 ILCS 5/108B-2(a) (West 2014). The statute provides that "[a] State's Attorney may apply for an order authorizing interception of private communications in accordance with the provisions of this Article .”
People v. Spears, 2024 IL App (1st) 181491 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “” 725 ILCS 5/108B-2(a) (West 2012). Article 108B further states: “[t]he State’s Attorney, or a person designated in writing or by law to act for him and to perform his duties during his absence or disability, may authorize, in writing, an ex parte application to the chief judge…”
People v. Allard, 2018 IL App (2d) 160927 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “” 725 ILCS 5/108B-2 (West 2014). The statute provides that “[a] State’s Attorney may apply for an order authorizing interception of private communications in accordance with the provisions of this Article.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.