ILCS » Chapter 725 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

725 ILCS 5/110-7 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(725 ILCS 5/110-7) (from Ch. 38, par. 110-7)
    Sec. 110-7. (Repealed).
(Source: Reenacted by P.A. 102-687, eff. 12-17-21. Repealed internally, eff. 1-1-23.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 51 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1998–2024 · leading case: Rowe v. Raoul, 2023 IL 129248 (Ill. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rowe v. Raoul, 2023 IL 129248 (Ill. 2023). “§ 10-260 (repealing 725 ILCS 5/110-7). The Act’s pretrial release provisions were scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2023.”
People v. Lovelace, 2018 IL App (4th) 170401 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 8× “The State argued that section 110-7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 ( 725 ILCS 5/110-7 (West 2016) ) made clear that bond not only secures a defendant's presence at trial but also provides a fund from which costs can be paid at the court's discretion.”
Delvin C. Payton v. Cnty. of Kane, 308 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 2002). “The section was codified as part of the Illinois Bond Statute, 725 ILCS 5/110-7(b), as amended (the Act).”
People v. McLENNON, 957 N.E.2d 1241 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). · cites it 2× “See 725 ILCS 5/110-7(f) (West 2008). In light of the parties' agreement, the fines for the Fund are reduced to $4 each and one of the 10% bond fees is vacated.”
People v. Lovelace, 2018 IL App (4th) 170401 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 7× “725 ILCS 5/110-7 (West 2016). Specifically, defendant challenges subsection (f), which states, in relevant part, the following: “When the conditions of the bail bond have been performed and the accused has been discharged from all obligations in the cause[,] the clerk of the…”
People v. Clark, 2019 IL 122891 (Ill. 2019). “states: “A failure to appear as required by such recognizance shall constitute an offense subject to the penalty provided in Section 32-10 of the Criminal Code of 2012 [(720 ILCS 5/32-10 (West 2014))] for violation of the bail bond, and any obligated sum fixed in the…”
People v. McBride, 2012 IL App (1st) 100375 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “” See 725 ILCS 5/110-7(h) (West 2004); 55 ILCS 5/4-2002.”
People v. Harris, 2012 IL App (1st) 92251 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “” See 725 ILCS 5/110-7(h) (West 2004); 55 ILCS 5/4-2002.”
People v. Devine, 2012 IL App (4th) 101028 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). · cites it 5× “When a 10% bond has been posted, then 90% of the bond posted shall be disbursed by the Clerk to satisfy any and all financial obligations in the court file in which the bond was posted as outlined in 725 ILCS 5/110-7, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “Bond Cost 725 ILCS 5/110-7(f) Downstate: 10% of Bond Posted $ Varies Cook: Not more than $100 Cost- People v.”
People v. Davison, 883 N.E.2d 648 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “See 725 ILCS 5/110-7(g) (West 2004). III. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we (1) reverse defendant's conviction for possession of a deadly substance, (2) reverse defendant's conviction and sentence for unlawful possession of a stolen vehicle so defendant may be afforded…”
People v. Chester, 2014 IL App (4th) 120564 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “According to the State, section 110-7(f) of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (725 ILCS 5/110-7(f) (West 2008)) directs the court clerk to retain 10% of the bail amount paid by defendant as bail-bond costs.”
Show all 51 citing cases →
— 725 ILCS 5/110-7(a) — 6 cases
People v. Harbach, 698 N.E.2d 281 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998).
People v. Lovelace, 2018 IL App (4th) 170401 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “The State argued that section 110-7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 ( 725 ILCS 5/110-7 (West 2016) ) made clear that bond not only secures a defendant's presence at trial but also provides a fund from which costs can be paid at the court's discretion.”
People v. Lovelace, 2018 IL App (4th) 170401 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “725 ILCS 5/110-7 (West 2016). Specifically, defendant challenges subsection (f), which states, in relevant part, the following: “When the conditions of the bail bond have been performed and the accused has been discharged from all obligations in the cause[,] the clerk of the…”
People v. Jackson, 2021 IL App (2d) 190033-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021).
People v. Taylor, 2021 IL App (4th) 190735-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021).
— 725 ILCS 5/110-7(b) — 2 cases
Delvin C. Payton v. Cnty. of Kane, 308 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 2002). “The section was codified as part of the Illinois Bond Statute, 725 ILCS 5/110-7(b), as amended (the Act).”
Payton, Delvin C. v. Cnty. of Kane (7th Cir. 2002).
— 725 ILCS 5/110-7(f) — 17 cases
People v. McLENNON, 957 N.E.2d 1241 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “See 725 ILCS 5/110-7(f) (West 2008). In light of the parties' agreement, the fines for the Fund are reduced to $4 each and one of the 10% bond fees is vacated.”
People v. Lovelace, 2018 IL App (4th) 170401 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “The State argued that section 110-7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 ( 725 ILCS 5/110-7 (West 2016) ) made clear that bond not only secures a defendant's presence at trial but also provides a fund from which costs can be paid at the court's discretion.”
People v. Lovelace, 2018 IL App (4th) 170401 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “725 ILCS 5/110-7 (West 2016). Specifically, defendant challenges subsection (f), which states, in relevant part, the following: “When the conditions of the bail bond have been performed and the accused has been discharged from all obligations in the cause[,] the clerk of the…”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “Bond Cost 725 ILCS 5/110-7(f) Downstate: 10% of Bond Posted $ Varies Cook: Not more than $100 Cost- People v.”
People v. Chester, 2014 IL App (4th) 120564 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “According to the State, section 110-7(f) of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (725 ILCS 5/110-7(f) (West 2008)) directs the court clerk to retain 10% of the bail amount paid by defendant as bail-bond costs.”
— 725 ILCS 5/110-7(g) — 13 cases
People v. Clark, 2019 IL 122891 (Ill. 2019). “states: “A failure to appear as required by such recognizance shall constitute an offense subject to the penalty provided in Section 32-10 of the Criminal Code of 2012 [(720 ILCS 5/32-10 (West 2014))] for violation of the bail bond, and any obligated sum fixed in the…”
People v. Davison, 883 N.E.2d 648 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “See 725 ILCS 5/110-7(g) (West 2004). III. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we (1) reverse defendant's conviction for possession of a deadly substance, (2) reverse defendant's conviction and sentence for unlawful possession of a stolen vehicle so defendant may be afforded…”
People v. Higuera, 2019 IL App (3d) 180730 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019).
People v. Scarbrough, 2015 IL App (3d) 130426 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015).
People v. Devine, 2012 IL App (4th) 101028 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “When a 10% bond has been posted, then 90% of the bond posted shall be disbursed by the Clerk to satisfy any and all financial obligations in the court file in which the bond was posted as outlined in 725 ILCS 5/110-7, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.”
— 725 ILCS 5/110-7(h) — 9 cases
People v. McBride, 2012 IL App (1st) 100375 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “” See 725 ILCS 5/110-7(h) (West 2004); 55 ILCS 5/4-2002.”
People v. Harris, 2012 IL App (1st) 92251 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “” See 725 ILCS 5/110-7(h) (West 2004); 55 ILCS 5/4-2002.”
People v. Harmon, 2015 IL App (1st) 122345 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015).
People v. Hoddenbach, 2023 IL App (1st) 092393-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023).
People v. Harmon, 2015 IL App (1st) 122345 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.