ILCS » Chapter 730 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1) (from Ch. 38, par. 1005-9-1.1)
    Sec. 5-9-1.1. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 100-987, Article 900, Section 900-5, eff. 8-20-18. Repealed by P.A. 100-987, Article 905, Section 905-93, eff. 7-1-19.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 58 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2023 · leading case: People v. Lewis, 912 N.E.2d 1220 (Ill. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Lewis, 912 N.E.2d 1220 (Ill. 2009). · cites it 5× “See 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1 (West 2004). Defendant acknowledges he did not object to the error in the trial court, but contends his claim is not subject to procedural default because the mandatory procedure for setting the fine was not followed.”
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 9× “4(b) (West 2010)), and a $70 street-value fine (730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) (West Supp. 2009) (text of section as amended by Public Acts 94-550 and 96-402)).”
People v. Warren, 2016 IL App (4th) 120721-B (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “) 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(b) (West 2010). ¶ 126 In Jones, 223 Ill.”
People v. Rodriguez, 839 N.E.2d 543 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). · cites it 5× “" 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1 (West 2004). This court recently construed a similar statute.”
People v. McCarty, 858 N.E.2d 15 (Ill. 2006). “At both sentencing hearings, the State conceded that it could not prove how much usable methamphetamine defendants produced.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 4× “Drug-Street 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) Eff. Determined by Judge based on evidence.”
People v. Warren, 2014 IL App (4th) 120721 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 4× “730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) (West 2010); People v.”
People v. Bond, 942 N.E.2d 585 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2× “730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) (West 2004). Street value is determined by the trial court "on the basis of testimony of law enforcement personnel and the defendant as to the amount seized and such testimony as may be required by the court as to the current street value of the * * *…”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). · cites it 4× “Drug-Street 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) Eff. 1/1/82 Determined by Judge based on evidence.”
People v. Warren, 2014 IL App (4th) 120721 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 4× “730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) (West 2010); People v.”
People v. Smith, 2013 IL App (2d) 120691 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “There, the court held that a statutory “fee” assessed against convicted defendants and deposited into a fund for research into spinal-cord injury (730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(c) (West 2004)) was actually a fine.”
People v. Unander, 936 N.E.2d 795 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “1(c) (West 2004)) because that section specifies the $5 fee "'shall not be considered a part of the fine for purposes of any reduction in the fine for time - 11 - served either before or after sentencing'"), quoting 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(c) (West 2004). D. $20 VCVA Assessment…”
Show all 58 citing cases →
— 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) — 17 cases
People v. Lewis, 912 N.E.2d 1220 (Ill. 2009). “See 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1 (West 2004). Defendant acknowledges he did not object to the error in the trial court, but contends his claim is not subject to procedural default because the mandatory procedure for setting the fine was not followed.”
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “4(b) (West 2010)), and a $70 street-value fine (730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) (West Supp. 2009) (text of section as amended by Public Acts 94-550 and 96-402)).”
People v. Bond, 942 N.E.2d 585 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) (West 2004). Street value is determined by the trial court "on the basis of testimony of law enforcement personnel and the defendant as to the amount seized and such testimony as may be required by the court as to the current street value of the * * *…”
People v. Warren, 2014 IL App (4th) 120721 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) (West 2010); People v.”
People v. Galmore, 889 N.E.2d 238 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
— 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a)(c) — 1 case
People v. McNeal (Ill. App. Ct. 2006).
— 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(b) — 20 cases
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “4(b) (West 2010)), and a $70 street-value fine (730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) (West Supp. 2009) (text of section as amended by Public Acts 94-550 and 96-402)).”
People v. Warren, 2016 IL App (4th) 120721-B (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “) 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(b) (West 2010). ¶ 126 In Jones, 223 Ill.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “Drug-Street 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) Eff. Determined by Judge based on evidence.”
People v. Warren, 2014 IL App (4th) 120721 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) (West 2010); People v.”
People v. Reyes, 2023 IL 128461 (Ill. 2023).
— 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(c) — 31 cases
People v. Warren, 2016 IL App (4th) 120721-B (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “) 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(b) (West 2010). ¶ 126 In Jones, 223 Ill.”
People v. Rodriguez, 839 N.E.2d 543 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). “" 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1 (West 2004). This court recently construed a similar statute.”
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “4(b) (West 2010)), and a $70 street-value fine (730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) (West Supp. 2009) (text of section as amended by Public Acts 94-550 and 96-402)).”
People v. Smith, 2013 IL App (2d) 120691 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “There, the court held that a statutory “fee” assessed against convicted defendants and deposited into a fund for research into spinal-cord injury (730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(c) (West 2004)) was actually a fine.”
People v. Unander, 936 N.E.2d 795 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “1(c) (West 2004)) because that section specifies the $5 fee "'shall not be considered a part of the fine for purposes of any reduction in the fine for time - 11 - served either before or after sentencing'"), quoting 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(c) (West 2004). D. $20 VCVA Assessment…”
— 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(d) — 5 cases
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “4(b) (West 2010)), and a $70 street-value fine (730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) (West Supp. 2009) (text of section as amended by Public Acts 94-550 and 96-402)).”
People v. Carreon, 2011 IL App (2d) 100391 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011).
People v. Carreon, 960 N.E.2d 665 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011).
People v. Devine, 2012 IL App (4th) 101028 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012).
People v. Dillard, 2014 IL App (3d) 121020 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
— 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(e) — 3 cases
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “4(b) (West 2010)), and a $70 street-value fine (730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) (West Supp. 2009) (text of section as amended by Public Acts 94-550 and 96-402)).”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “Drug-Street 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) Eff. Determined by Judge based on evidence.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “Drug-Street 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) Eff. 1/1/82 Determined by Judge based on evidence.”
— 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(f) — 3 cases
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “4(b) (West 2010)), and a $70 street-value fine (730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) (West Supp. 2009) (text of section as amended by Public Acts 94-550 and 96-402)).”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “Drug-Street 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) Eff. Determined by Judge based on evidence.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “Drug-Street 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(a) Eff. 1/1/82 Determined by Judge based on evidence.”
— 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(f)(i) — 3 cases
People v. Williams, 2014 IL App (3d) 120240 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
People v. Williams, 2014 IL App (3d) 120240 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
People v. Williams, 2014 IL App (3d) 120240 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
— 730 ILCS 5/5-9-1.1(f)(ii) — 3 cases
People v. Williams, 2014 IL App (3d) 120240 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
People v. Williams, 2014 IL App (3d) 120240 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
People v. Williams, 2014 IL App (3d) 120240 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.