ILCS » Chapter 735 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

735 ILCS 5/14-105 (2026)

Judgment - Costs

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(735 ILCS 5/14-105) (from Ch. 110, par. 14-105)
    Sec. 14-105. Judgment - Costs. If judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff, the plaintiff shall recover damages and costs. If judgment is entered in favor of the defendant, the defendant shall recover costs.
(Source: P.A. 82-280.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Shempf v. Chaviano, 2019 IL App (1st) 173146 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Shempf v. Chaviano, 2019 IL App (1st) 173146 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 3× “See 735 ILCS 5/14-105 (West 2016).) ¶ 19 The Department filed a written response to the motion for clarification or rule to show cause, arguing that the Department complied with the court's order and that, in any event, the circuit court *420 *508 lacked jurisdiction to consider…”
Shempf v. Chaviano, 2019 IL App (1st) 173146 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 2× “See 735 ILCS 5/14-105 (West 2016).) ¶ 19 The Department filed a written response to the motion for clarification or rule to show cause, arguing that the Department complied with the court’s order and that, in any event, the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to consider Shempf’s…”
Rooding v. Peters, 92 F.3d 578 (7th Cir. 1996). · cites it 3× “Nevertheless, the district court found that the Illinois mandamus statute, 735 ILCS 5/14-105, 1 provided Rooding with the opportunity to obtain damages and that Rooding's failure to seek damages under that provision barred him from seeking damages in a subsequent 1983 action.”
Rooding v. Peters, 92 F.3d 578 (7th Cir. 1996). · cites it 2× “Nevertheless, the district court found that the Illinois mandamus statute, 735 ILCS 5/14-105, 1 provided Rooding with the opportunity to obtain damages and that Rooding’s failure to seek damages under that provision barred him from seeking damages in a subsequent § 1983 action.”
Rooding v. Peters, 876 F. Supp. 946 (N.D. Ill. 1995). “735 ILCS 5/14-105 provides: If judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff, the plaintiff shall recover damages and costs.”
Kotara, LLC v. Schneider, 2018 IL App (3d) 160525 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “” 735 ILCS 5/14-105 ( West 2014 ). “§ 5-109.”
Kotara, LLC v. Schneider, 2018 IL App (3d) 160525 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “" 735 ILCS 5/14-105 ( West 2014 ). " § 5-109.”
Holtz v. Waggoner (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 4× “735 ILCS 5/14-105 (West 2004). Section 14-105 provides: 3 "Judgment–Costs.”
Shempf v. Chaviano, 2019 IL App (1st) 173146 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 2× “See 735 ILCS 5/14-105 (West 2016).) ¶ 19 The Department filed a written response to the motion for clarification or rule to show cause, arguing that the Department complied with the court’s order and that, in any event, the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to consider Shempf’s…”
Walters v. Dep't of Corr., 2025 IL App (4th) 241550-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2025). “” 735 ILCS 5/14-105 (West 2022). Here, no judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff as to any mandamus claim to compel defendants to enforce the standards at the Jail, nor will one be entered due to the mootness of that claim.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.