ILCS » Chapter 735 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

735 ILCS 5/15-1101 (2026)

Title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(735 ILCS 5/15-1101) (from Ch. 110, par. 15-1101)
    Sec. 15-1101. Title. This Article shall be known, and may be cited, as the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law.
(Source: P.A. 84-1462.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 101 cases (22 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: EMC Mortg. Corp. v. Kemp, 2012 IL 113419 (Ill. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
EMC Mortg. Corp. v. Kemp, 2012 IL 113419 (Ill. 2013). “Upon entry of such a judgment, the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (735 ILCS 5/15-1101 et seq. (West 2010)) provides for the sale of the property once periods for reinstatement and redemption have expired.”
Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v. Kmiecik, 2013 IL App (1st) 121700 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “¶2 On January 8, 2010, Aurora filed its complaint to foreclose mortgage against defendant and Elzbieta Kmiecik, pursuant to the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (Foreclosure Law) (735 ILCS 5/15-1101 et seq. (West 2010)). The complaint alleged as follows: on March 21, 2007,…”
MidFirst Bank v. McNeal, 2016 IL App (1st) 150465 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “On June 28, 2012, MidFirst Bank filed a complaint in the circuit court of Cook County for foreclosure pursuant to the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (735 ILCS 5/15-1101 et seq. (West 2012)). The complaint named the unknown heirs and/or legatees of Inez Elese McNeal, deceased,…”
Nationwide Advantage Mortg. Co. v. Ortiz, 2012 IL App (1st) 112755 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “On March 10, 2010, plaintiff was granted judgment for foreclosure and sale pursuant to the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (the Law) (735 ILCS 5/15-1101 et seq. (West 2010)). Defendant subsequently filed motions to withdraw his answer and to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint under…”
U.S. Bank Trust v. Atchley, 2015 IL App (3d) 150144 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “Specifically, plaintiff argues that it fulfilled each of the criteria required to receive an in personam deficiency judgment under the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (Foreclosure Law) (735 ILCS 5/15-1101 et seq. (West 2012)). We agree.”
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Adeyiga, 2014 IL App (1st) 131252 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “¶3 On December 8, 2011, the trial court denied Olufemi and Bola’s motion to dismiss and granted the Bank’s motions: (1) for summary judgment against Olufemi; (2) for default against Bola; and (3) for judgment of foreclosure pursuant to the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (the…”
Hill v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 946 F. Supp. 2d 817 (N.D. Ill. 2013). “Drawing all reasonable inferences in the Hills’ favor, the court must conclude at this stage that LPS was hoping that its illegal conduct would ultimately drive the Hills out of their home so that Wells Fargo could take possession without having to go through the potentially…”
NAB Bank v. LaSalle Bank, N.A., 2013 IL App (1st) 121147 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “Our supreme court adopted the four-part test almost 50 years before the legislature codified it as part of the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (735 ILCS 5/15-1101 et seq. (West 2010)). See Levy v.”
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust v. Gilbert, 2012 IL App (2d) 120164 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “, as “the legal holder of the indebtedness, a pledgee, an agent, the trustee under a trust deed or otherwise.”
US Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Villasenor, 2012 IL App (1st) 120061 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “Ellis also alleges that PTC would be required to foreclose on her mortgage in accordance with Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (735 ILCS 5/15-1101 et seq. (West 2004)) before title could pass to a third party.”
The Forest Preserve Dist. of Cook Cnty. v. Royalty Props., LLC, 2018 IL App (1st) 181323 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “1-18-1323 Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (Foreclosure Law) (735 ILCS 5/15-1101 et seq. (West 2008)). On appeal, we again vacated that order, finding that, without an evidentiary hearing, the trial court did not have an adequate basis for finding the Forest Preserve as…”
Parkway Bank & Trust Co. v. Korzen, 2013 IL App (1st) 130380 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “” In the mortgage, Zanzola and Korzen waived their rights of redemption and reinstatement in case of a foreclosure, a waiver which is only valid if the property is not “residential” as defined by the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (Foreclosure Law) (735 ILCS 5/15-1101 et seq.…”
Show all 101 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.