Illinois Compiled Statutes
735 ILCS 5/18-108 (2026)
Judgment
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(735 ILCS 5/18-108)
(from Ch. 110, par. 18-108)
Sec. 18-108.
Judgment.
The court shall determine and adjudge
the rights of all
parties to the proceeding. In case any person or corporation against
whom such complaint is filed is adjudged guilty as charged in the
complaint, the court may enter judgment of ouster against such person
or corporation from the office or franchise, and fine such person or
corporation, and also enter judgment in favor of the relator for the
cost of the prosecution. Instead of entering judgment of ouster
from a franchise for an abuse thereof, the court may fine the person or
corporation found guilty in any sum not exceeding $25,000.00 for each
offense. When judgment is entered in favor of any defendant, such defendant
shall recover costs against the relator.
(Source: P.A. 83-707.)
(735 ILCS 5/Art. XIX heading) ARTICLE XIX
REPLEVIN
|
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2017–2023 · leading case: Goral v. Dart, 2020 IL 125085 (Ill. 2020).
Goral v. Dart, 2020 IL 125085 (Ill. 2020). “735 ILCS 5/18-108 (West 2018); People ex rel.”
People el rel. Wofford v. Brown, 2017 IL App (1st) 161118 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “735 ILCS 5/18-108 (West 2014). ¶ 14 Pursuant to the quo warranto statute, therefore, “a private citizen seeking to bring an action in quo warranto on his own behalf must first request the [AG] or the [SA] to file the action.”
People ex rel. Rahn v. Vohra, 2017 IL App (2d) 160953 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 735 ILCS 5/18-108 (West 2016). -3- Rahn argued that he had identified numerous offenses that would each warrant defendant forfeiting his office.”
People ex rel. Rahn v. Vohra, 2017 IL App (2d) 160953 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 735 ILCS 5/18-108 (West 2016). Rahn argued that he had identified numerous offenses that would each warrant defendant forfeiting his office.”
People el rel. Wofford v. Brown, 2017 IL App (1st) 161118 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “735 ILCS 5/18-108 (West 2014). ¶ 14 Pursuant to the quo warranto statute, therefore, “a private citizen seeking to bring an action in quo warranto on his own behalf must first request the [AG] or the [SA] to file the action.”
People v. Zimel, 2023 IL App (2d) 230201-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “While the quo warranto statute provides that, if a defendant in a quo warranto proceeding is found guilty as charged, the trial court may enter a judgment of ouster or impose a fine (see 735 ILCS 5/18-108 (West 2022)), section 55-6 of the Township Code (60 ILCS 1/55-6 (West…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|