ILCS » Chapter 735 · Act 5

735 ILCS 5/2-106

Transfer

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(735 ILCS 5/2-106) (from Ch. 110, par. 2-106)
    Sec. 2-106. Transfer. (a) Transfer for wrong venue. If a motion to transfer is allowed on the ground that the action was commenced in a wrong venue, the cause shall be transferred to the court in a proper venue, subject to any equitable terms and conditions that may be prescribed.
    (b) Method of transfer. The clerk of the court from which a transfer is granted shall immediately certify and transmit to the clerk of the court to which the transfer is ordered the originals of all papers filed in the case together with copies of all orders entered therein. In the event of a severance, certified copies of papers filed and orders entered shall be transmitted. The clerk of the court to which the transfer is ordered shall file the papers and transcript transmitted to him or her and docket the case, and the action shall proceed and be determined as if it had originated in that court.
(Source: P.A. 82-280.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1999–2014 · leading case: Slepicka v. The State of Illinois
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Slepicka v. The State of Illinois (2013) illappct · cites it 2× “See 735 ILCS 5/2-106(b) (West 2012). ¶5 I. BACKGROUND ¶6 Defendant operates a skilled nursing facility in Palos Park, in Cook County.”
Slepicka v. Illinois Department of Public Health (2014) ill “” 735 ILCS 5/2-106(a) (West 2012). These two provisions, which are contained in article II of the Code, apply to proceedings under the Administrative Review Law, unless that statute provides otherwise.”
Slepicka v. Illinois Department of Public Health (2014) ill “” 735 ILCS 5/2-106(a) (West 2012). These two provisions, which are contained in article II of the Code, apply to proceedings under the Administrative Review Law, unless that statute provides otherwise.”
Rensing v. Merck and Co., Inc. (2006) illappct · cites it 2× “See 735 ILCS 5/2-106 (West 2004). In the motion to transfer and supporting documentation, the defendant established that it is incorporated under the laws of the State of New Jersey, *704 with its principal place of business in New Jersey.”
Rensing v. Merck and Company, Inc. (2006) illappct · cites it 2× “See 735 ILCS 5/2-106 (West 2004). In the motion to transfer and supporting documentation, the defendant established that it is incorporated under the laws of the State of New Jersey, with its principal place of business in New Jersey.”
Winn v. Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America, Inc. (1999) illappct · cites it 2× “735 ILCS 5/2-106 (West 1996). Thus, Dominique did not address venue within the same meaning as in the instant case, and we therefore find it inapposite.”
Slepicka v. Illinois Department of Public Health (2014) ill “” 735 ILCS 5/2-106(a) (West 2012). These two provisions, which are contained in article II of the Code, apply to proceedings under the Administrative Review Law, unless that statute provides otherwise.”
— 735 ILCS 5/2-106(a) — 4 cases
Slepicka v. Illinois Department of Public Health (2014) ill “” 735 ILCS 5/2-106(a) (West 2012). These two provisions, which are contained in article II of the Code, apply to proceedings under the Administrative Review Law, unless that statute provides otherwise.”
Slepicka v. Illinois Department of Public Health (2014) ill “” 735 ILCS 5/2-106(a) (West 2012). These two provisions, which are contained in article II of the Code, apply to proceedings under the Administrative Review Law, unless that statute provides otherwise.”
Slepicka v. Illinois Department of Public Health (2014) ill “” 735 ILCS 5/2-106(a) (West 2012). These two provisions, which are contained in article II of the Code, apply to proceedings under the Administrative Review Law, unless that statute provides otherwise.”
Winn v. Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America, Inc. (1999) illappct “735 ILCS 5/2-106 (West 1996). Thus, Dominique did not address venue within the same meaning as in the instant case, and we therefore find it inapposite.”
— 735 ILCS 5/2-106(b) — 1 case
Slepicka v. The State of Illinois (2013) illappct “See 735 ILCS 5/2-106(b) (West 2012). ¶5 I. BACKGROUND ¶6 Defendant operates a skilled nursing facility in Palos Park, in Cook County.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.