ILCS » Chapter 740 · Act 160

740 ILCS 160/1

This Act shall be known and may be cited as the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(740 ILCS 160/1) (from Ch. 59, par. 101)
    Sec. 1. This Act shall be known and may be cited as the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act.
(Source: P.A. 86-814.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 145 cases (17 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case: Premier Property Management, Inc. v. Chavez
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Premier Property Management, Inc. v. Chavez (2000) ill · cites it 4× “Premier contended that the conveyance should be set aside as fraudulent pursuant to the terms of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (hereinafter, Fraudulent Transfer Act) (740 ILCS 160/1 et seq. (West 1996)). Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Premier's complaint under…”
Alpha School Bus Co., Inc. v. Wagner (2009) illappct · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint also includes a count for violation of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (the Transfer Act) (740 ILCS 160/1 (West 2006)), which simply incorporates the same count from plaintiffs’ original complaint.”
In Re Marriage of Del Giudice (1997) illappct · cites it 6× “740 ILCS 160/1 et seq. (West 1994). We find that it can and remand for further proceedings.”
Doctors Hospital of Hyde Park, Inc. v. Desnick (In Re Doctors Hospital of Hyde Park, Inc.) (2007) ilnb · cites it 4× “Counts VIII and IX assert that the Guaranty, an Operator Pledge and Security Agreement, the Equity Pledge Agreement (“Guaranty and Related Agreements”), and all rent payments made to HPCH pursuant to the HPCH Lease were fraudulent transfers under the Illinois Uniform Fraudulent…”
Bank of America v. WS Management, Inc. (2015) illappct · cites it 5× “(Anderson), cross-appeal, contending: (1) the trial court should have found that certain facts and issues were precluded by collateral estoppel; (2) the trial court erred in finding that defendants violated the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (Fraudulent Transfer Act) (740 ILCS…”
Krol v. Wilcek (In Re H. King & Associates) (2003) ilnb · cites it 2× “Alternatively, the Trustee seeks to avoid the transfers as fraudulent conveyances pursuant to the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, 740 ILCS 160/1 et seq. In addition, the Trustee seeks interest, costs and attorneys’ fees.”
Apollo Real Estate Investmend Fund, IV, L.P. v. Gelber (2009) illappct · cites it 2× “Counts I and II stated claims against all defendants under the Illinois Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (740 ILCS 160/1 et seq. (West 2006)), and count III was a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against Brian Gelber.”
Aps Sports Collectibles, Inc. v. Sports Time, Inc. (2002) ca7 · cites it 2× “The district court dismissed all the counts of APS's complaint except one count of fraudulent transfer under the Illinois Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), 740 ILCS 160/1 et seq. 2 After full discovery, the district court granted summary judgment for the noncorporate…”
Solow v. Reinhardt (In Re First Commercial Management Group, Inc.) (2002) ilnb · cites it 2× “§ 544 and 740 ILCS 160/1,” and its prayer for relief refers to “Section 5 of the Illinois Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act.”
Berland v. Mussa (In Re Mussa) (1997) ilnb · cites it 3× “Count I was brought against Souleman, Nexhmije, and théir son James Mussa (“James”) to avoid transfers of property from Debtors to James alleged to be fraudulent pursuant to Code § 544(b) and 740 ILCS 160/1 et seq., and also to enjoin the three Defendants from further disposing…”
Steel Co. v. Morgan Marshall Industries, Inc. (1996) illappct · cites it 2× “(now 740 ILCS 160/1 et seq. (West 1994))). The circuit court granted defendants’ motion.”
In Re Marriage of Romano (2012) illappct “Tarshis testified that he prepared a memorandum that discussed the applicability of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (Transfer Act) (740 ILCS 160/1 et seq. (West 2008)) to this case.”
Show all 145 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.