ILCS » Chapter 740 · Act 80

740 ILCS 80/0.01

Short title

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(740 ILCS 80/0.01) (from Ch. 59, par. 0.01)
    Sec. 0.01. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Frauds Act.
(Source: P.A. 86-1324.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1993–2025 · leading case: Tabora v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tabora v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital (1996) illappct · cites it 2× “740 ILCS 80/0.01 et seq. (West 1992) (formerly Ill.”
Klem v. First National Bank of Chicago (1995) illappct · cites it 2× “) Despite this seemingly clear and unambiguous bar on actions "on or in any way related to” unwritten credit agreements, the plaintiff nonetheless contends that the long-standing common-law exceptions to the Frauds Act (740 ILCS 80/0.”
Hubble v. O'CONNOR (1997) illappct “” Purchasers filed their cross-motion for summary judgment asserting both that the attorney disapproval provision had been properly exercised and that the Illinois Fraud Act (the Statute of Frauds) (740 ILCS 80/0.01 et seq. (West 1994)) prevented sellers from enforcing the…”
Johnson v. George J. Ball, Inc. (1993) illappct “Defendant contends that, even assuming that consideration was adequate, plaintiff fails to allege a sufficiently definite promise of employment for a particular term.”
FIRST NAT. BANK IN STAUNTON v. McBride Chevrolet, Inc. (1994) illappct “Defendants argue even if the Act does encompass the fact situation involved here, it does not bar traditional exceptions to a statute of frauds defense.”
Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. La Salle National Bank (1998) illappct “Although relatively few Illinois cases have construed the Act, those that have done so have uniformly held that the language of the Act is broad and was intended to extend beyond the existing Frauds Act (740 ILCS 80/0.”
In re Estate of Adames (2020) illappct “Janell and Kyle further argued that the statute of frauds (740 ILCS 80/0.01 et seq. (West 2018)) bars enforcement because the draft agreement included a 10-year lease, a confidentiality agreement that required performance for an indefinite period, and a shareholder agreement…”
Miwel, Inc. v. Kanzler (2019) illappct “Kanzler’s motion asserted that the parties’ oral agreement was unenforceable under the Frauds Act (740 ILCS 80/0.01 et seq. (West 2016)) and that the suit was barred by the statute of limitations and the doctrine of laches.”
In Re Parentage of MJ (2003) ill “Raymond filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that Alexis' common law claims, contained in counts I and II, were unenforceable under the provisions of the Frauds Act (740 ILCS 80/0.01 et seq. (West 1998)) and contravened Illinois public policy.”
Evans v. Gurnee Inns, Inc. (1994) illappct “1 On appeal the defendants have raised the Statute of Frauds (also known-as the Frauds Act) (740 ILCS 80/0.01 et seq. (West 1992)), arguing that we should apply it as a procedural bar to plaintiff’s claim.”
McAloon v. Northwest Bancorp, Inc. (1995) illappct “Defendants respond that the language of the Act is broader than the language of the Frauds Act (740 ILCS 80/0.01 et seq. (West 1992)) and is, consequently, intended to bar the traditional defenses to the Frauds Act.”
Jurgensen v. Haslinger (1998) illappct “(now 740 ILCS 80/0.01 et seq. (West 1996)). The Derby Meadows court explained that an affirmative defense based upon the statute of limitations is easier to anticipate and analyze than an affirmative defense based upon the statute of frauds, which has many exceptions.”
Show all 26 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.