ILCS » Chapter 745 · Act 22
Illinois Compiled Statutes

745 ILCS 22/10 (2026)

Immunity

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(745 ILCS 22/10)
    Sec. 10. Immunity. A federal law enforcement officer while acting as a peace officer under Section 2-13 of the Criminal Code of 2012 is not liable for his or her act or omission in the execution or enforcement of any law unless the act or omission constitutes wilful and wanton conduct.
(Source: P.A. 97-1150, eff. 1-25-13.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2022–2024 · leading case: McIntosh v. United States (N.D. Ill. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McIntosh v. United States (N.D. Ill. 2022). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff’s battery claim is barred by Illinois’s Federal Law Enforcement Officer Immunity Act, 745 ILCS 22/10; 4. Plaintiff’s failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing suit; and 5.”
Butler v. United States (N.D. Ill. 2024). · cites it 2× “§ 247d-6d; (2) it is immunized from FTCA negligence claims by Illinois’s Federal Law Enforcement Officer Immunity Act, 745 ILCS 22/10; (3) Plaintiff’s theory of institutional FTCA liability is not cognizable under the circumstances of this case; and (4) the FTCA’s “quarantine…”
Gonzalez-Loza v. United States (N.D. Ill. 2023). “4 The government argues that (1) Gonzalez-Loza's suit is barred by the FTCA's discretionary function exception; (2) it is immune from Gonzalez-Loza's FTCA claims under the Illinois Federal Law Enforcement Officer Immunity Act, 745 ILCS 22/10; and (3) Gonzalez-Loza has not met…”
Gonzalez-Loza v. Downey (N.D. Ill. 2023). “4 The government argues that (1) Gonzalez-Loza's suit is barred by the FTCA's discretionary function exception; (2) it is immune from Gonzalez-Loza's FTCA claims under the Illinois Federal Law Enforcement Officer Immunity Act, 745 ILCS 22/10; and (3) Gonzalez-Loza has not met…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.