ILCS » Chapter 750 · Act 5

750 ILCS 5/602

(Repealed)

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(750 ILCS 5/602) (from Ch. 40, par. 602)
    Sec. 602. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 96-676, eff. 1-1-10. Repealed by P.A. 99-90, eff. 1-1-16.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 137 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: Connor v. VELINDA C.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Connor v. VELINDA C. (2005) illappct · cites it 10× “The trial court reviewed the factors in section 602(a) of the Dissolution Act (750 ILCS 5/602(a) (West 2002)) and determined that it was in Jasmine’s best interests to award custody to Barbara.”
In Re Marriage of Bates (2004) ill · cites it 4× “did not enjoy “a close and continuing relationship” with her father under section 602 (750 ILCS 5/602 (West 2002)). Moreover, the evidence showed that, as a result of the damaged relationship with her father, S.”
In re Parentage of J.W. (2013) ill · cites it 7× “The circuit court of Vermilion County applied the best interests of the child standard set forth in section 602 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (the Marriage Act) (750 ILCS 5/602 (West 2010)), and found that it was not in the minor child’s best interests…”
Petition of Kirchner (1995) ill · cites it 6× “" (750 ILCS 5/602 (West 1992).) The court is to consider all relevant circumstances in making that determination, and the statute lists a number of matters that should be considered.”
In Re Marriage of Wycoff (1994) illappct · cites it 6× “Judith was ordered to pay child support of $300 per month.”
In re Marriage of Lonvick (2013) illappct · cites it 5× “See 750 ILCS 5/602 (West 2010). Dr. Blechman met with Linda, Eric, and E.”
In Re Marriage of Wanstreet (2006) illappct · cites it 4× “750 ILCS 5/602 (West 2004). The court was presented with conflicting evidence on several factors.”
Johnston v. Weil (2011) ill · cites it 4× “) 750 ILCS 5/602(a) (West 2006). Section 604(b) provides: "(b) The court may seek the advice of professional personnel, whether or not employed by the court on a regular basis.”
In Re Marriage of Gambla and Woodson (2006) illappct · cites it 8× “Christopher argues that the trial court failed to consider all of the requisite statutory factors and improperly considered the fact that Kira is biracial.”
In Re Marriage of Marsh (2003) illappct · cites it 4× “The Trial Court's Custody Decision Brooks first argues that the trial court abused its discretion by granting Frankie custody of J.M. and L.M. We disagree. When making child custody determinations, the trial court should consider all relevant factors, including those listed in…”
In Re Marriage of Ricketts (2002) illappct · cites it 3× “” 750 ILCS 5/602(a) (West 2000). Contrary to Denise’s contention, there is no indication that the trial court failed to consider these factors in its decision or that its decision was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.”
In Re Marriage of Hefer (1996) illappct · cites it 4× “” 750 ILCS 5/602(a)(2) (West 1994). Nevertheless, there are problems with making the decision of the child the determinant.”
Show all 137 citing cases →
— 750 ILCS 5/602(8) — 1 case
In re Marriage of Bates (2004) ill
— 750 ILCS 5/602(a) — 52 cases
Johnston v. Weil (2011) ill “) 750 ILCS 5/602(a) (West 2006). Section 604(b) provides: "(b) The court may seek the advice of professional personnel, whether or not employed by the court on a regular basis.”
In re Parentage of J.W. (2013) ill “The circuit court of Vermilion County applied the best interests of the child standard set forth in section 602 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (the Marriage Act) (750 ILCS 5/602 (West 2010)), and found that it was not in the minor child’s best interests…”
Connor v. VELINDA C. (2005) illappct “The trial court reviewed the factors in section 602(a) of the Dissolution Act (750 ILCS 5/602(a) (West 2002)) and determined that it was in Jasmine’s best interests to award custody to Barbara.”
In Re Marriage of Gambla and Woodson (2006) illappct “Christopher argues that the trial court failed to consider all of the requisite statutory factors and improperly considered the fact that Kira is biracial.”
Petition of Kirchner (1995) ill “" (750 ILCS 5/602 (West 1992).) The court is to consider all relevant circumstances in making that determination, and the statute lists a number of matters that should be considered.”
— 750 ILCS 5/602(a)(1) — 8 cases
In Re Marriage of Brownfield (1996) illappct
In Re Marriage of Rudsell (1997) illappct
In re Mariage of Adamson (2016) illappct
In re Marriage of Young (2015) illappct
In Re Guardianship of Alexander O. (2003) illappct
— 750 ILCS 5/602(a)(2) — 6 cases
In Re Marriage of Wycoff (1994) illappct “Judith was ordered to pay child support of $300 per month.”
In Re Marriage of Wanstreet (2006) illappct “750 ILCS 5/602 (West 2004). The court was presented with conflicting evidence on several factors.”
In Re Marriage of Hefer (1996) illappct “” 750 ILCS 5/602(a)(2) (West 1994). Nevertheless, there are problems with making the decision of the child the determinant.”
In re B.B. (2011) illappct
In Re Bb (2011) illappct
— 750 ILCS 5/602(a)(3) — 9 cases
In Re Marriage of Wycoff (1994) illappct “Judith was ordered to pay child support of $300 per month.”
Connor v. VELINDA C. (2005) illappct “The trial court reviewed the factors in section 602(a) of the Dissolution Act (750 ILCS 5/602(a) (West 2002)) and determined that it was in Jasmine’s best interests to award custody to Barbara.”
In Re Marriage of Hefer (1996) illappct “” 750 ILCS 5/602(a)(2) (West 1994). Nevertheless, there are problems with making the decision of the child the determinant.”
In Re Marriage of Archibald (2006) illappct
In Re Marriage of Haslett (1994) illappct
— 750 ILCS 5/602(a)(4) — 5 cases
In re Marriage of Lonvick (2013) illappct “See 750 ILCS 5/602 (West 2010). Dr. Blechman met with Linda, Eric, and E.”
Connor v. VELINDA C. (2005) illappct “The trial court reviewed the factors in section 602(a) of the Dissolution Act (750 ILCS 5/602(a) (West 2002)) and determined that it was in Jasmine’s best interests to award custody to Barbara.”
In Re Marriage of Hefer (1996) illappct “” 750 ILCS 5/602(a)(2) (West 1994). Nevertheless, there are problems with making the decision of the child the determinant.”
Connor v. Velinda C. (2005) illappct
In re: Marriage of Wanstreet (2006) illappct
— 750 ILCS 5/602(a)(5) — 5 cases
In Re Marriage of Ricketts (2002) illappct “” 750 ILCS 5/602(a) (West 2000). Contrary to Denise’s contention, there is no indication that the trial court failed to consider these factors in its decision or that its decision was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.”
Connor v. VELINDA C. (2005) illappct “The trial court reviewed the factors in section 602(a) of the Dissolution Act (750 ILCS 5/602(a) (West 2002)) and determined that it was in Jasmine’s best interests to award custody to Barbara.”
In re Marriage of Wendy L. D. (2017) illappct
In re Marriage of Wendy L. D. (2017) illappct
Connor v. Velinda C. (2005) illappct
— 750 ILCS 5/602(a)(6) — 3 cases
Connor v. VELINDA C. (2005) illappct “The trial court reviewed the factors in section 602(a) of the Dissolution Act (750 ILCS 5/602(a) (West 2002)) and determined that it was in Jasmine’s best interests to award custody to Barbara.”
In Re Marriage of Haslett (1994) illappct
Connor v. Velinda C. (2005) illappct
— 750 ILCS 5/602(a)(7) — 2 cases
Connor v. VELINDA C. (2005) illappct “The trial court reviewed the factors in section 602(a) of the Dissolution Act (750 ILCS 5/602(a) (West 2002)) and determined that it was in Jasmine’s best interests to award custody to Barbara.”
Connor v. Velinda C. (2005) illappct
— 750 ILCS 5/602(a)(8) — 20 cases
In Re Marriage of Bates (2004) ill “did not enjoy “a close and continuing relationship” with her father under section 602 (750 ILCS 5/602 (West 2002)). Moreover, the evidence showed that, as a result of the damaged relationship with her father, S.”
In Re Marriage of Ricketts (2002) illappct “” 750 ILCS 5/602(a) (West 2000). Contrary to Denise’s contention, there is no indication that the trial court failed to consider these factors in its decision or that its decision was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.”
In re Marriage of Debra N. (2014) illappct
In Re Marriage of Wanstreet (2006) illappct “750 ILCS 5/602 (West 2004). The court was presented with conflicting evidence on several factors.”
In Re Marriage of Spent (2003) illappct
— 750 ILCS 5/602(a)(l) — 5 cases
Connor v. VELINDA C. (2005) illappct “The trial court reviewed the factors in section 602(a) of the Dissolution Act (750 ILCS 5/602(a) (West 2002)) and determined that it was in Jasmine’s best interests to award custody to Barbara.”
In Re Marriage of Stopher (2002) illappct
In Re Marriage of Haslett (1994) illappct
In Re Marriage of Arcaute (1994) illappct
In re Guardianship of Alexander O. (2003) illappct
— 750 ILCS 5/602(aX6) — 1 case
In Re Marriage of Hartman (1993) illappct
— 750 ILCS 5/602(aX7) — 1 case
In Re Marriage of Hartman (1993) illappct
— 750 ILCS 5/602(aXl) — 1 case
In Re Marriage of Hartman (1993) illappct
— 750 ILCS 5/602(b) — 4 cases
People v. Warren (1996) ill
In Re Marriage of Johnson (1993) illappct
In re Marriage of Craig (2002) illappct
People v. Warren (1996) ill
— 750 ILCS 5/602(c) — 6 cases
In re Parentage of J.W. (2013) ill “The circuit court of Vermilion County applied the best interests of the child standard set forth in section 602 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (the Marriage Act) (750 ILCS 5/602 (West 2010)), and found that it was not in the minor child’s best interests…”
In Re Marriage of Jerome and Martinez (1994) illappct
Burris v. Department of Children and Family Services (2011) illappct
In Re Marriage of Mehring (2001) illappct
Burris v. DCFS. (2011) illappct
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.