750 ILCS 5/607
(Repealed)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(750 ILCS 5/607)
(from Ch. 40, par. 607)
Sec. 607. (Repealed). (Source: P.A. 99-143, eff. 7-27-15. Repealed by P.A. 99-90, eff. 1-1-16.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 132
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: Lulay v. Lulay
Lulay v. Lulay (2000)
“308): "Should section 607 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/607) be interpreted to permit the court to conduct a hearing and determine whether it is in the best interest of a child to visit with grandparents who seek such visitation from their…”
Wickham v. Byrne (2002)
“section (b), a petition for visitation privileges may be filed under this paragraph (1) * * * if one or more of the following circumstances exist: (A) the parents are not currently cohabiting on a permanent or an indefinite basis; (B) one of the parents has been absent from the…”
Flynn v. Henkel (2006)
“" 750 ILCS 5/607 (a-5) (West Supp 2005). Alice, called as an adverse witness, testified that, shortly after E.”
In Re Marriage of Engelkens (2004)
“2d 1038 , quoting 750 ILCS 5/607(a) (West 1994). The court refused to" fashion a different standard for nonbiological parents" because (1) the biological parents had waived any argument that a different standard was constitutionally compelled, (2) the court "doubt[ed]" applying…”
In Re Marriage of Saheb and Khazal (2007)
“In the alternative, the father argues that the governing statute in the case at bar is not the visitation statute (750 ILCS 5/607 (West 2006)), but a removal statute (750 ILCS 5/609 (West 2006)).”
People v. Warren (1996)
“See 750 ILCS 5/607 (West 1994) ("[a] parent not granted custody of the child is entitled to reasonable visitation rights” (emphasis added)); see also 750 ILCS 5/602.”
In Re Marriage of Sobol (2003)
“In October 2002, the trial court entered a lengthy docket entry, finding the standards of section 607(c) of the Act (750 ILCS 5/607(c) (West 2000)) applied to the case, determining that remaining in Illinois was in the children's best interests, granting petitioner's petition…”
In re Parentage of J.W. (2013)
“The appellate court reversed, concluding that section 607(a) of the Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/607(a) (West 2010)) is the relevant standard to be considered, entitling a noncustodial parent to a rebuttable presumption of reasonable visitation unless it can be shown that visitation…”
Langman v. Langman (2001)
“On appeal, Amy argues: (1) section 607(b)(1) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (Act) is unconstitutional as applied in this case (750 ILCS 5/607(b)(l) (West 1998)); (2) section 607(b)(1) of the Act is unconstitutional on its face (750 ILCS 5/607(b)(l)…”
Felzak v. Hruby (2006)
“On April 6, 1994, plaintiff, Deborah's mother, filed a petition for grandparent visitation with the Hruby children pursuant to section 607(b) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (the Act) (750 ILCS 5/607(b) (West 1992)). In her petition for grandparent…”
Flynn v. Henkel (2007)
“Cindy filed a petition in the circuit court of Lee County for grandparent visitation against Alice in December 2005 under section 607(a — 5) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/607(a — 5) (West 2006)), commonly called the grandparent visitation…”
West v. West (1998)
“On May 15, 1996, Ginger filed a notice of claim of unconstitutionality of the grandparental visitation statute (750 ILCS 5/607(b) (West 1996)). The trial court denied Ginger’s motion to declare the statute unconstitutional.”
— 750 ILCS 5/607(a) — 48 cases
People v. Warren (1996)
“See 750 ILCS 5/607 (West 1994) ("[a] parent not granted custody of the child is entitled to reasonable visitation rights” (emphasis added)); see also 750 ILCS 5/602.”
In re Parentage of J.W. (2013)
“The appellate court reversed, concluding that section 607(a) of the Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/607(a) (West 2010)) is the relevant standard to be considered, entitling a noncustodial parent to a rebuttable presumption of reasonable visitation unless it can be shown that visitation…”
J.S.A. v. M.H. (2008)
In Re Marriage of Deem (2002)
In Re Marriage of Engelkens (2004)
“2d 1038 , quoting 750 ILCS 5/607(a) (West 1994). The court refused to" fashion a different standard for nonbiological parents" because (1) the biological parents had waived any argument that a different standard was constitutionally compelled, (2) the court "doubt[ed]" applying…”
— 750 ILCS 5/607(b) — 28 cases
Wickham v. Byrne (2002)
“section (b), a petition for visitation privileges may be filed under this paragraph (1) * * * if one or more of the following circumstances exist: (A) the parents are not currently cohabiting on a permanent or an indefinite basis; (B) one of the parents has been absent from the…”
In Re Marriage of Engelkens (2004)
“2d 1038 , quoting 750 ILCS 5/607(a) (West 1994). The court refused to" fashion a different standard for nonbiological parents" because (1) the biological parents had waived any argument that a different standard was constitutionally compelled, (2) the court "doubt[ed]" applying…”
Felzak v. Hruby (2006)
“On April 6, 1994, plaintiff, Deborah's mother, filed a petition for grandparent visitation with the Hruby children pursuant to section 607(b) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (the Act) (750 ILCS 5/607(b) (West 1992)). In her petition for grandparent…”
West v. West (1998)
“On May 15, 1996, Ginger filed a notice of claim of unconstitutionality of the grandparental visitation statute (750 ILCS 5/607(b) (West 1996)). The trial court denied Ginger’s motion to declare the statute unconstitutional.”
Felzak v. Hruby (2007)
— 750 ILCS 5/607(b)(1) — 24 cases
Lulay v. Lulay (2000)
“308): "Should section 607 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/607) be interpreted to permit the court to conduct a hearing and determine whether it is in the best interest of a child to visit with grandparents who seek such visitation from their…”
Wickham v. Byrne (2002)
“section (b), a petition for visitation privileges may be filed under this paragraph (1) * * * if one or more of the following circumstances exist: (A) the parents are not currently cohabiting on a permanent or an indefinite basis; (B) one of the parents has been absent from the…”
In Re Marriage of Engelkens (2004)
“2d 1038 , quoting 750 ILCS 5/607(a) (West 1994). The court refused to" fashion a different standard for nonbiological parents" because (1) the biological parents had waived any argument that a different standard was constitutionally compelled, (2) the court "doubt[ed]" applying…”
Flynn v. Henkel (2006)
“" 750 ILCS 5/607 (a-5) (West Supp 2005). Alice, called as an adverse witness, testified that, shortly after E.”
In Re Marriage of Mehring (2001)
— 750 ILCS 5/607(b)(1)(A) — 1 case
West v. West (1998)
“On May 15, 1996, Ginger filed a notice of claim of unconstitutionality of the grandparental visitation statute (750 ILCS 5/607(b) (West 1996)). The trial court denied Ginger’s motion to declare the statute unconstitutional.”
— 750 ILCS 5/607(b)(1)(B) — 2 cases
Lulay v. Lulay (2000)
“308): "Should section 607 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/607) be interpreted to permit the court to conduct a hearing and determine whether it is in the best interest of a child to visit with grandparents who seek such visitation from their…”
Lulay v. Lulay (2000)
— 750 ILCS 5/607(b)(1)(C) — 6 cases
Lulay v. Lulay (2000)
“308): "Should section 607 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/607) be interpreted to permit the court to conduct a hearing and determine whether it is in the best interest of a child to visit with grandparents who seek such visitation from their…”
Wickham v. Byrne (2002)
“section (b), a petition for visitation privileges may be filed under this paragraph (1) * * * if one or more of the following circumstances exist: (A) the parents are not currently cohabiting on a permanent or an indefinite basis; (B) one of the parents has been absent from the…”
West v. West (1998)
“On May 15, 1996, Ginger filed a notice of claim of unconstitutionality of the grandparental visitation statute (750 ILCS 5/607(b) (West 1996)). The trial court denied Ginger’s motion to declare the statute unconstitutional.”
West v. Gollahon (1999)
Lulay v. Lulay (2000)
— 750 ILCS 5/607(b)(1)(D) — 5 cases
Lulay v. Lulay (2000)
“308): "Should section 607 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/607) be interpreted to permit the court to conduct a hearing and determine whether it is in the best interest of a child to visit with grandparents who seek such visitation from their…”
West v. West (1998)
“On May 15, 1996, Ginger filed a notice of claim of unconstitutionality of the grandparental visitation statute (750 ILCS 5/607(b) (West 1996)). The trial court denied Ginger’s motion to declare the statute unconstitutional.”
In re Marriage of Ross (2005)
In re Marriage of Sullivan (2003)
Lulay v. Lulay (2000)
— 750 ILCS 5/607(b)(3) — 2 cases
Wickham v. Byrne (2002)
“section (b), a petition for visitation privileges may be filed under this paragraph (1) * * * if one or more of the following circumstances exist: (A) the parents are not currently cohabiting on a permanent or an indefinite basis; (B) one of the parents has been absent from the…”
Wickham v. Byrne (2002)
— 750 ILCS 5/607(b)(l) — 12 cases
Lulay v. Lulay (2000)
“308): "Should section 607 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/607) be interpreted to permit the court to conduct a hearing and determine whether it is in the best interest of a child to visit with grandparents who seek such visitation from their…”
Wickham v. Byrne (2002)
“section (b), a petition for visitation privileges may be filed under this paragraph (1) * * * if one or more of the following circumstances exist: (A) the parents are not currently cohabiting on a permanent or an indefinite basis; (B) one of the parents has been absent from the…”
Langman v. Langman (2001)
“On appeal, Amy argues: (1) section 607(b)(1) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (Act) is unconstitutional as applied in this case (750 ILCS 5/607(b)(l) (West 1998)); (2) section 607(b)(1) of the Act is unconstitutional on its face (750 ILCS 5/607(b)(l)…”
Flynn v. Henkel (2007)
“Cindy filed a petition in the circuit court of Lee County for grandparent visitation against Alice in December 2005 under section 607(a — 5) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/607(a — 5) (West 2006)), commonly called the grandparent visitation…”
Flynn v. Henkel (2006)
“" 750 ILCS 5/607 (a-5) (West Supp 2005). Alice, called as an adverse witness, testified that, shortly after E.”
— 750 ILCS 5/607(b)(l)(B) — 1 case
Lulay v. Lulay (2000)
“308): "Should section 607 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/607) be interpreted to permit the court to conduct a hearing and determine whether it is in the best interest of a child to visit with grandparents who seek such visitation from their…”
— 750 ILCS 5/607(b)(l)(C) — 2 cases
Lulay v. Lulay (2000)
“308): "Should section 607 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/607) be interpreted to permit the court to conduct a hearing and determine whether it is in the best interest of a child to visit with grandparents who seek such visitation from their…”
Wickham v. Byrne (2002)
“section (b), a petition for visitation privileges may be filed under this paragraph (1) * * * if one or more of the following circumstances exist: (A) the parents are not currently cohabiting on a permanent or an indefinite basis; (B) one of the parents has been absent from the…”
— 750 ILCS 5/607(b)(l)(D) — 3 cases
Lulay v. Lulay (2000)
“308): "Should section 607 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/607) be interpreted to permit the court to conduct a hearing and determine whether it is in the best interest of a child to visit with grandparents who seek such visitation from their…”
In Re Marriage of Sullivan (2003)
In Re Marriage of Ross (2005)
— 750 ILCS 5/607(c) — 41 cases
In Re Marriage of Sobol (2003)
“In October 2002, the trial court entered a lengthy docket entry, finding the standards of section 607(c) of the Act (750 ILCS 5/607(c) (West 2000)) applied to the case, determining that remaining in Illinois was in the children's best interests, granting petitioner's petition…”
In Re Marriage of Saheb and Khazal (2007)
“In the alternative, the father argues that the governing statute in the case at bar is not the visitation statute (750 ILCS 5/607 (West 2006)), but a removal statute (750 ILCS 5/609 (West 2006)).”
In Re Marriage of Wycoff (1994)
In Re Marriage of Minix (2003)
— 750 ILCS 5/607(e) — 3 cases
In re Marriage of Donald B. (2014)
In Re Marriage of Sullivan (2003)
In re Marriage of Donald B. (2014)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|