Illinois Compiled Statutes

755 ILCS 5/11-10.1 (2026)

Procedure for appointment of a standby guardian or a guardian of a minor

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(755 ILCS 5/11-10.1) (from Ch. 110 1/2, par. 11-10.1)
    Sec. 11-10.1. Procedure for appointment of a standby guardian or a guardian of a minor.
    (a) Unless excused by the court for good cause shown, it is the duty of the petitioner to give notice of the time and place of the hearing on the petition, in person or by mail, to the minor, if the minor is 14 years, or older, and to the relatives and the short-term guardian of the minor whose names and addresses are stated in the petition, not less than 7 days before the hearing, but failure to give notice to any relative is not jurisdictional.
    (b) In any proceeding for the appointment of a standby guardian or a guardian the court may appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the minor in the proceeding.
(Source: P.A. 98-1082, eff. 1-1-15; 99-207, eff. 7-30-15.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2015–2025 · leading case: Nichols v. Fahrenkamp, 2019 IL 123990 (Ill. 2021).
Nichols v. Fahrenkamp, 2019 IL 123990 (Ill. 2021). · cites it 4× “) 755 ILCS 5/11-10.1 (West 2016). This phrase limits the applicability of section 11-10.”
Nichols v. Fahrenkamp, 2019 IL 123990 (Ill. 2019). · cites it 2× “755 ILCS 5/11-10.1 (West 2016); In re Estates of Azevedo, 115 Ill.”
In re Est. of B.R.S., 2015 IL App (3d) 150038 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). · cites it 3× “) 755 ILCS 5/11-10.1 (West 2014). ¶ 13 The plain language of the statute evidences a clear legislative intent that all the information it deemed necessary for the court’s determination of the best interest of the child who is the subject of the guardianship proceeding must be…”
In re Est. of B.R.S., 2015 IL App (3d) 150038 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). · cites it 2× “755 ILCS 5/11-10.1 (West 2014) (“failure to give notice to any relative is not jurisdictional”).”
In re Guardianship of J.O., 2025 IL App (4th) 241026-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2025). “1(a) of the Probate Act (755 ILCS 5/11-10.1(a) (West 2020)). Nevertheless, the father did not appear in the guardianship case until some three years later.”
Kennedy v. Tate, 2021 IL App (1st) 190913-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “1(b) of the Probate Act of 1975 (Probate Act) (755 ILCS 5/11-10.1(b) (West 2018)); and (4) consolidated case number 2018 P 6143 into the present case, 2018 P 5845 .”
— 755 ILCS 5/11-10.1(a) — 1 case
In re Guardianship of J.O., 2025 IL App (4th) 241026-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2025). “1(a) of the Probate Act (755 ILCS 5/11-10.1(a) (West 2020)). Nevertheless, the father did not appear in the guardianship case until some three years later.”
— 755 ILCS 5/11-10.1(b) — 3 cases
Nichols v. Fahrenkamp, 2019 IL 123990 (Ill. 2021). “) 755 ILCS 5/11-10.1 (West 2016). This phrase limits the applicability of section 11-10.”
Nichols v. Fahrenkamp, 2019 IL 123990 (Ill. 2019). “755 ILCS 5/11-10.1 (West 2016); In re Estates of Azevedo, 115 Ill.”
Kennedy v. Tate, 2021 IL App (1st) 190913-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “1(b) of the Probate Act of 1975 (Probate Act) (755 ILCS 5/11-10.1(b) (West 2018)); and (4) consolidated case number 2018 P 6143 into the present case, 2018 P 5845 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.