Illinois Compiled Statutes
775 ILCS 5/7-101.1 (2026)
(Repealed)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(775 ILCS 5/7-101.1)
Sec. 7-101.1. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 89-520, eff. 7-18-96. Repealed by P.A. 95-243, eff. 1-1-08.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1998–2007 · leading case: Folbert v. Dep't of Human Rights, 707 N.E.2d 590 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999).
Folbert v. Dep't of Human Rights, 707 N.E.2d 590 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “775 ILCS 5/7-101.1 (West 1996). In determining what process is due, the court balances three factors: First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used and the probable…”
Brewer v. Bd. of Trs. of Univ. Of Ill., 791 N.E.2d 657 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “Illinois has not clearly waived sovereign immunity; far from it, Illinois has clearly reinstated sovereign immunity, with the two narrow qualifications the Immunity Act specifies.”
Moren v. Illinois Dept. of Human Rights, 790 N.E.2d 86 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “The Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq.”
Kalush v. Dept. of Human Rights (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “775 ILCS 5/7-101.1, 8-111(A)(1) (West 1996).”
Folbert v. Dept. of Human RIghts (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “August 18, 1995 (amending 775 ILCS 5/7-101.1) (West 1996))). Under Public Act 89-370, the Department's dismissal of a discrimination claim for lack of substantial evidence is no longer reviewed by the Illinois Human Rights Commission but is now reviewed by the chief legal…”
Willis v. Dep't of Human Rights (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “However, the prior law did not afford claimants a full hearing before the Commission.”
Traficano v. Dept. of Human Rights (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “1(A), 7A-102(G)(3) and 8-111(A)(1) of the Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/7-101.1(A), 7A-102(G)(3), 8-111(A)(1) (West 1996)), as well as Supreme Court Rule 335 (155 Ill.”
Beard v. Spectrum, LP (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). “Therefore, there is no evidence that Respondent discharged Complainant because of his arrest record.” On July 16, 2004, petitioner appealed.”
Deen v. Lustig (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “The Chief Legal counsel may consider "supplemental evidence timely submitted" (775 ILCS 5/7-101.1(B) (West 2000)), but Deen does not argue nor does the record reflect these documents were submitted with Deen's request for review.”
Moren v. Illinois Dep't of Human Rights Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “See 775 ILCS 5/7-101.1(a) (West 2000) (request for review); 775 ILCS 5/8-111(a)(1) (West 2000) (judicial review).”
In the Matter of: C.R.M. v. Chief Legal Couns. of the Illinois Dep't of Human Rights (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “DECISION Petitioner contends the Chief Legal Counsel erred in sustaining the Department’s dismissal of his charge of discrimination.”
— 775 ILCS 5/7-101.1(A) — 7 cases
Folbert v. Dep't of Human Rights, 707 N.E.2d 590 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “775 ILCS 5/7-101.1 (West 1996). In determining what process is due, the court balances three factors: First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used and the probable…”
Brewer v. Bd. of Trs. of Univ. Of Ill., 791 N.E.2d 657 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “Illinois has not clearly waived sovereign immunity; far from it, Illinois has clearly reinstated sovereign immunity, with the two narrow qualifications the Immunity Act specifies.”
Kalush v. Dept. of Human Rights (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “775 ILCS 5/7-101.1, 8-111(A)(1) (West 1996).”
Traficano v. Dept. of Human Rights (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “1(A), 7A-102(G)(3) and 8-111(A)(1) of the Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/7-101.1(A), 7A-102(G)(3), 8-111(A)(1) (West 1996)), as well as Supreme Court Rule 335 (155 Ill.”
Folbert v. Dept. of Human RIghts (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “August 18, 1995 (amending 775 ILCS 5/7-101.1) (West 1996))). Under Public Act 89-370, the Department's dismissal of a discrimination claim for lack of substantial evidence is no longer reviewed by the Illinois Human Rights Commission but is now reviewed by the chief legal…”
— 775 ILCS 5/7-101.1(B) — 5 cases
Folbert v. Dep't of Human Rights, 707 N.E.2d 590 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “775 ILCS 5/7-101.1 (West 1996). In determining what process is due, the court balances three factors: First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used and the probable…”
Willis v. Dep't of Human Rights (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “However, the prior law did not afford claimants a full hearing before the Commission.”
Deen v. Lustig (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “The Chief Legal counsel may consider "supplemental evidence timely submitted" (775 ILCS 5/7-101.1(B) (West 2000)), but Deen does not argue nor does the record reflect these documents were submitted with Deen's request for review.”
Kalush v. Dept. of Human Rights (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “775 ILCS 5/7-101.1, 8-111(A)(1) (West 1996).”
Folbert v. Dept. of Human RIghts (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “August 18, 1995 (amending 775 ILCS 5/7-101.1) (West 1996))). Under Public Act 89-370, the Department's dismissal of a discrimination claim for lack of substantial evidence is no longer reviewed by the Illinois Human Rights Commission but is now reviewed by the chief legal…”
— 775 ILCS 5/7-101.1(a) — 2 cases
Moren v. Illinois Dept. of Human Rights, 790 N.E.2d 86 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “The Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq.”
Moren v. Illinois Dep't of Human Rights Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “See 775 ILCS 5/7-101.1(a) (West 2000) (request for review); 775 ILCS 5/8-111(a)(1) (West 2000) (judicial review).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|