Illinois Compiled Statutes
775 ILCS 5/7-108 (2026)
Local Departments, Commissions
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(775 ILCS 5/7-108)
(from Ch. 68, par. 7-108)
Sec. 7-108. Local Departments, Commissions.
(A) Authority.
A political subdivision, or two or more political subdivisions
acting jointly, may create a local department or commission as it or they
see fit to promote the purposes of this Act and to secure for all individuals
within the jurisdiction of the political subdivision or subdivisions freedom
from unlawful discrimination, sexual harassment in employment
and sexual harassment in elementary, secondary, and
higher education. The provisions of any ordinance
enacted by any municipality or county which prohibits broader or different
categories of discrimination than are prohibited by this Act are not
invalidated or affected by this Act.
(B) Concurrent Jurisdiction. When the Department and a local department
or commission have concurrent jurisdiction over a complaint, either may
transfer the complaint to the other under regulations established by the
Department.
(C) Exclusive Jurisdiction. When the Department or a local department
or commission has jurisdiction over a complaint and the other does not,
the Department or local department or commission without jurisdiction may
transfer the complaint to the other under regulations established by the
Department.
(D) To secure and guarantee the rights established by
Sections 17, 18 and 19 of Article I of the Illinois Constitution,
any ordinance, resolution, rule or regulation of any county,
municipality or other unit of local government or of any local
department or commission which prohibits, restricts, narrows or limits the
housing choice of any person is unenforceable and void. Nothing in this
amendatory Act of 1981 prohibits a unit of local government from making
special outreach efforts to inform members of minority groups of housing
opportunities available in areas of majority white concentration and make
similar efforts to inform the majority white population of available
housing opportunities located in areas of minority concentration. This
paragraph is applicable to home rule units as well as non-home rule units.
Pursuant to Article VII, Section 6, paragraph (i) of the
Illinois Constitution, this amendatory Act of 1981 is a limitation
of the power of home rule units.
(Source: P.A. 96-1319, eff. 7-27-10.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1998–2016 · leading case: Bremen Cmty. High Sch. Dist. No. 228 v. The Cook Cnty. Comm'n on Human Rights, 2012 IL App (1st) 112177 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012).
Bremen Cmty. High Sch. Dist. No. 228 v. The Cook Cnty. Comm'n on Human Rights, 2012 IL App (1st) 112177 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “” 775 ILCS 5/7-108(A) (West 2010). The Cook County Human Rights Ordinance provides: “INTRODUCTION Recognizing the need to combat the effects of bias and bigotry throughout Cook County, the Cook County Board of Commissioners adopted the Cook County Human Rights Ordinance on March…”
Cook Cnty. Sheriff's Off. v. Cook Cnty. Comm'n on Human Rights, 2016 IL App (1st) 150718 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “" 775 ILCS 5/7-108(A) (West 2012). To accomplish this end, section 42-34(c) of the Ordinance enumerates 12 forms of remedy which may be imposed by the - 20 - 1-15-0718 Commission upon a finding of unlawful discrimination under the Ordinance.”
Crittenden v. The Cook Cnty. Comm'n on Human Rights, 2013 IL 114876 (Ill. 2013). “¶ 13 The Illinois Human Rights Act (Act) (775 ILCS 5/7-108 (West 2010)) authorizes a local government, like Cook County, to create a local commission to promote the purposes of the Act.”
The Decatur Park Dist. v. City of Decatur, 2016 IL App (4th) 150699 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “The court found section 7-108 of the Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/7-108 (West 2012)) provides the City with concurrent jurisdiction with the State on discrimination matters.”
Page v. City of Chicago (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “775 ILCS 5/7-108(A) (West 1996). Page maintains that because he cannot be an "employer" under the Human Rights Act, he therefore cannot be an employer under the Ordinance and is not subject to its provisions regarding sexual harassment.”
— 775 ILCS 5/7-108(A) — 4 cases
Cook Cnty. Sheriff's Off. v. Cook Cnty. Comm'n on Human Rights, 2016 IL App (1st) 150718 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “" 775 ILCS 5/7-108(A) (West 2012). To accomplish this end, section 42-34(c) of the Ordinance enumerates 12 forms of remedy which may be imposed by the - 20 - 1-15-0718 Commission upon a finding of unlawful discrimination under the Ordinance.”
Bremen Cmty. High Sch. Dist. No. 228 v. The Cook Cnty. Comm'n on Human Rights, 2012 IL App (1st) 112177 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “” 775 ILCS 5/7-108(A) (West 2010). The Cook County Human Rights Ordinance provides: “INTRODUCTION Recognizing the need to combat the effects of bias and bigotry throughout Cook County, the Cook County Board of Commissioners adopted the Cook County Human Rights Ordinance on March…”
The Decatur Park Dist. v. City of Decatur, 2016 IL App (4th) 150699 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “The court found section 7-108 of the Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/7-108 (West 2012)) provides the City with concurrent jurisdiction with the State on discrimination matters.”
Page v. City of Chicago (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “775 ILCS 5/7-108(A) (West 1996). Page maintains that because he cannot be an "employer" under the Human Rights Act, he therefore cannot be an employer under the Ordinance and is not subject to its provisions regarding sexual harassment.”
— 775 ILCS 5/7-108(B) — 1 case
Bremen Cmty. High Sch. Dist. No. 228 v. The Cook Cnty. Comm'n on Human Rights, 2012 IL App (1st) 112177 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “” 775 ILCS 5/7-108(A) (West 2010). The Cook County Human Rights Ordinance provides: “INTRODUCTION Recognizing the need to combat the effects of bias and bigotry throughout Cook County, the Cook County Board of Commissioners adopted the Cook County Human Rights Ordinance on March…”
— 775 ILCS 5/7-108(D) — 1 case
Page v. City of Chicago (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “775 ILCS 5/7-108(A) (West 1996). Page maintains that because he cannot be an "employer" under the Human Rights Act, he therefore cannot be an employer under the Ordinance and is not subject to its provisions regarding sexual harassment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|