Illinois Compiled Statutes
805 ILCS 105/112.50 (2026)
Grounds for judicial dissolution
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(805 ILCS 105/112.50)
(from Ch. 32, par. 112.50)
Sec. 112.50. Grounds for judicial dissolution. A
Circuit Court may dissolve a corporation:
(a) In an action by the Attorney General, if it is
established that:
(1) the corporation filed its articles of | incorporation through fraud; |
(2) the corporation has continued to exceed or abuse | the authority conferred upon it by law, or has continued to violate the law, after notice of the same has been given to such corporation, either personally or by registered mail; |
(3) any interrogatory propounded by the Secretary of | State to the corporation, its officers or directors, as provided in this Act, has been answered falsely or has not been answered fully within 30 days after the mailing of such interrogatories by the Secretary of State or within such extension of time as shall have been authorized by the Secretary of State; |
(4) the corporation has solicited money and failed to | use the money for the purpose which it was solicited, or has fraudulently solicited money or fraudulently used the money solicited; or |
(5) the corporation has substantially and willfully | violated the provisions of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. |
(b) In an action by a member entitled to vote, or a
director, if it is established that:
(1) the directors are deadlocked, whether because of | even division in the number thereof or because of greater than majority voting requirements in the articles of incorporation or the bylaws, in the management of the corporate affairs; the members are unable to break the deadlock; and irreparable injury to the corporation is thereby caused or threatened; |
(2) the directors or those in control of the | corporation have acted, are acting, or will act in a manner that is illegal, oppressive or fraudulent; |
(3) the corporate assets are being misapplied or | wasted; or |
(4) the corporation is unable to carry out its | purposes. |
(c) In an action by a creditor, if it is established that:
(1) the creditor's claim has been reduced to | judgment, the judgment has been returned unsatisfied, and the corporation is insolvent; or |
(2) the corporation has admitted in writing that the | creditor's claim is due and owing, and the corporation is insolvent. |
(d) In an action by the corporation to dissolve under court
supervision, if it is established that the corporation is
unable to carry out its purposes.
(Source: P.A. 96-66, eff. 1-1-10; 96-1000, eff. 7-2-10.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2014–2025 · leading case: Palm v. 2800 Lake Shore Drive Condo. Ass'n, 2014 IL App (1st) 111290 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
Palm v. 2800 Lake Shore Drive Condo. Ass'n, 2014 IL App (1st) 111290 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “50(a)(2), (a)(3) and (a)(4) of the Not for Profit Act (805 ILCS 105/112.50(a)(2)-(4) (West 2004)).”
Islamic Ctr. of Chicago W. Suburbs v. Fahmy, 2020 IL App (2d) 190249-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “50 of the Act (805 ILCS 105/112.50 (West 2016)). ¶ 29 On April 5, 2018, defendants filed a “Motion to Appoint a Temporary Custodian.”
Lincoln Univ. v. Logan Cnty., 2025 IL App (4th) 241012 (Ill. App. Ct. 2025). “805 ILCS 105/112.50(a)(2) (West 2022). Neither the local assessor nor IDOR has been granted such authority.”
— 805 ILCS 105/112.50(a)(2) — 2 cases
Palm v. 2800 Lake Shore Drive Condo. Ass'n, 2014 IL App (1st) 111290 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “50(a)(2), (a)(3) and (a)(4) of the Not for Profit Act (805 ILCS 105/112.50(a)(2)-(4) (West 2004)).”
Lincoln Univ. v. Logan Cnty., 2025 IL App (4th) 241012 (Ill. App. Ct. 2025). “805 ILCS 105/112.50(a)(2) (West 2022). Neither the local assessor nor IDOR has been granted such authority.”
— 805 ILCS 105/112.50(b) — 1 case
Islamic Ctr. of Chicago W. Suburbs v. Fahmy, 2020 IL App (2d) 190249-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “50 of the Act (805 ILCS 105/112.50 (West 2016)). ¶ 29 On April 5, 2018, defendants filed a “Motion to Appoint a Temporary Custodian.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|