ILCS » Chapter 805 · Act 180
Illinois Compiled Statutes

805 ILCS 180/35-65 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(805 ILCS 180/35-65)
    Sec. 35-65. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 90-424, eff. 1-1-98. Repealed by P.A. 99-637, eff. 7-1-17.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2016–2020 · leading case: Flynn v. Maschmeyer, 2020 IL App (1st) 190784 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Flynn v. Maschmeyer, 2020 IL App (1st) 190784 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). · cites it 3× “” 805 ILCS 180/35-65(a)(1) (West 2012). ¶ 106 In the case at bar, the trial court examined the reports of the parties’ experts and largely adopted the valuation presented by Hollis, which it found persuasive.”
Angelopoulos v. Keystone Orthopedic Specialists, S.C., 207 F. Supp. 3d 850 (N.D. Ill. 2016). “Defendants argue that they are entitled to summary judgment on Count Four because “Plaintiff cannot point to a date when he gave notice to WACHN of his express will to dissociate from WACHN or actually dissociated from WACHN,” and “as such has no evidence that he dissociated…”
— 805 ILCS 180/35-65(3) — 1 case
Angelopoulos v. Keystone Orthopedic Specialists, S.C., 207 F. Supp. 3d 850 (N.D. Ill. 2016). “Defendants argue that they are entitled to summary judgment on Count Four because “Plaintiff cannot point to a date when he gave notice to WACHN of his express will to dissociate from WACHN or actually dissociated from WACHN,” and “as such has no evidence that he dissociated…”
— 805 ILCS 180/35-65(a)(1) — 1 case
Flynn v. Maschmeyer, 2020 IL App (1st) 190784 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “” 805 ILCS 180/35-65(a)(1) (West 2012). ¶ 106 In the case at bar, the trial court examined the reports of the parties’ experts and largely adopted the valuation presented by Hollis, which it found persuasive.”
— 805 ILCS 180/35-65(d) — 1 case
Flynn v. Maschmeyer, 2020 IL App (1st) 190784 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “” 805 ILCS 180/35-65(a)(1) (West 2012). ¶ 106 In the case at bar, the trial court examined the reports of the parties’ experts and largely adopted the valuation presented by Hollis, which it found persuasive.”
— 805 ILCS 180/35-65(e) — 1 case
Flynn v. Maschmeyer, 2020 IL App (1st) 190784 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “” 805 ILCS 180/35-65(a)(1) (West 2012). ¶ 106 In the case at bar, the trial court examined the reports of the parties’ experts and largely adopted the valuation presented by Hollis, which it found persuasive.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.