ILCS » Chapter 810 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

810 ILCS 5/1-102 (2026)

Scope of Article

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(810 ILCS 5/1-102) (from Ch. 26, par. 1-102)
    Sec. 1-102. Scope of Article. This Article applies to a transaction to the extent that it is governed by another Article of the Uniform Commercial Code.
(Source: P.A. 95-895, eff. 1-1-09.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1993–2007 · leading case: Razor v. Hyundai Motor Am., 854 N.E.2d 607 (Ill. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Razor v. Hyundai Motor Am., 854 N.E.2d 607 (Ill. 2006). · cites it 2× “" This result could not have been reached under either the dependent or independent approach, and we find the analysis difficult to reconcile with the UCC itself. We find the case-by-case approach injects uncertainty into the UCC, an area of the law in which uniformity and…”
Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd., 675 N.E.2d 584 (Ill. 1996). “" 810 ILCS 5/1-102(2)(c) (West 1994); 13 Pa.”
In Re Doctors Hosp. of Hyde Park, Inc., 272 B.R. 677 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2002). · cites it 3× “” 810 ILCS 5/9-102; see also 810 ILCS 5/1-102(30) (defining “person” as “an individual or organization”); 810 ILCS 5/1-102(28) (defining “organization” to include a “government or governmental subdivision or agency”).”
Echo, Inc., an Illinois Corp. v. The Whitson Co., Inc. D/B/A Power Tool Co., a Tennessee Corp., 52 F.3d 702 (7th Cir. 1995). “Section 2-717 does not prohibit parties from drafting contracts that expand or shrink their rights to set-off. PTC argues that two clauses of the distributorship agreement effectively expand their rights to set-off under § 2-717 (and Schieffelin and Shintom America) to include…”
Magallanes Inv., Inc. v. Circuit Sys., Inc., 994 F.2d 1214 (7th Cir. 1993). “810 ILCS 5/1-102(2)(b). The UCC also provides that written agreements “may be explained or supplemented [ ] by course of dealing or usage of trade * * 810 ILCS 5/2-202(a).”
Malnove Inc. of Nebraska v. Hearthside Baking Co., 944 F. Supp. 657 (N.D. Ill. 1996). “The only response he received from the Cohens was that Maurice Lenell would take the boxes when they wanted them and they did not want them yet. 16. The understanding under the parties’ contract and in the industry is that Maurice Lenell was obligated to take delivery of all…”
Crossroads Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Sterling Truck Corp. (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “See 810 ILCS 5/1-102(3) (West 2000) ("The effect of provisions of this Act [(the UCC)] may be varied by agreement").”
Midwest Builders v. Lord & Essex (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “” 810 ILCS 5/1-102(3) (West 2006). If read with rigid literalism, the wording of the contractual definition might seem to indicate that Lord & Essex has not accepted the goods and hence does not have to deal with any of the consequences of acceptance.”
— 810 ILCS 5/1-102(2)(b) — 1 case
Magallanes Inv., Inc. v. Circuit Sys., Inc., 994 F.2d 1214 (7th Cir. 1993). “810 ILCS 5/1-102(2)(b). The UCC also provides that written agreements “may be explained or supplemented [ ] by course of dealing or usage of trade * * 810 ILCS 5/2-202(a).”
— 810 ILCS 5/1-102(2)(c) — 2 cases
Razor v. Hyundai Motor Am., 854 N.E.2d 607 (Ill. 2006). “" This result could not have been reached under either the dependent or independent approach, and we find the analysis difficult to reconcile with the UCC itself. We find the case-by-case approach injects uncertainty into the UCC, an area of the law in which uniformity and…”
Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd., 675 N.E.2d 584 (Ill. 1996). “" 810 ILCS 5/1-102(2)(c) (West 1994); 13 Pa.”
— 810 ILCS 5/1-102(28) — 1 case
In Re Doctors Hosp. of Hyde Park, Inc., 272 B.R. 677 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2002). “” 810 ILCS 5/9-102; see also 810 ILCS 5/1-102(30) (defining “person” as “an individual or organization”); 810 ILCS 5/1-102(28) (defining “organization” to include a “government or governmental subdivision or agency”).”
— 810 ILCS 5/1-102(3) — 4 cases
Echo, Inc., an Illinois Corp. v. The Whitson Co., Inc. D/B/A Power Tool Co., a Tennessee Corp., 52 F.3d 702 (7th Cir. 1995). “Section 2-717 does not prohibit parties from drafting contracts that expand or shrink their rights to set-off. PTC argues that two clauses of the distributorship agreement effectively expand their rights to set-off under § 2-717 (and Schieffelin and Shintom America) to include…”
Malnove Inc. of Nebraska v. Hearthside Baking Co., 944 F. Supp. 657 (N.D. Ill. 1996). “The only response he received from the Cohens was that Maurice Lenell would take the boxes when they wanted them and they did not want them yet. 16. The understanding under the parties’ contract and in the industry is that Maurice Lenell was obligated to take delivery of all…”
Crossroads Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Sterling Truck Corp. (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “See 810 ILCS 5/1-102(3) (West 2000) ("The effect of provisions of this Act [(the UCC)] may be varied by agreement").”
Midwest Builders v. Lord & Essex (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “” 810 ILCS 5/1-102(3) (West 2006). If read with rigid literalism, the wording of the contractual definition might seem to indicate that Lord & Essex has not accepted the goods and hence does not have to deal with any of the consequences of acceptance.”
— 810 ILCS 5/1-102(30) — 1 case
In Re Doctors Hosp. of Hyde Park, Inc., 272 B.R. 677 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2002). “” 810 ILCS 5/9-102; see also 810 ILCS 5/1-102(30) (defining “person” as “an individual or organization”); 810 ILCS 5/1-102(28) (defining “organization” to include a “government or governmental subdivision or agency”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.