ILCS » Chapter 810 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

810 ILCS 5/2-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(810 ILCS 5/2-101) (from Ch. 26, par. 2-101)
    Sec. 2-101. Short title. This Article shall be known and may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code--Sales.
(Source: Laws 1961, p. 2101.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1994–2024 · leading case: Shields Pork Plus, Inc. v. Swiss Valley Ag Serv., 767 N.E.2d 945 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Shields Pork Plus, Inc. v. Swiss Valley Ag Serv., 767 N.E.2d 945 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “5/2-105(1), Uniform Commercial Code Comment 1, at 73-74 (Smith-Hurd 1993).”
Trans States Airlines v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc., 682 N.E.2d 45 (Ill. 1997). “Furthermore, strict products liability arose out of a concern that consumers and remote parties are not on an equal footing with the manufacturer or seller to bargain effectively for the allocation of risk.”
Budnick Converting, Inc. v. Nebula Glass Int'l, Inc., 866 F. Supp. 2d 976 (S.D. Ill. 2012). · cites it 2× “Further, Budnick argues that Glasslam’s claims are defeated by the Illinois Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”), 810 ILCS 5/2-101, et seq., because Glasslam has failed to prove the existence of an oral agreement and because Budnick did not expressly warrant the product at issue;…”
3Com Corp. v. Elec. Recovery Specialists, Inc., 104 F. Supp. 2d 932 (N.D. Ill. 2000). “According to defendants the contract at issue here concerns a transaction in goods and therefore is governed by Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), 810 ILCS 5/2-101 et seq. Article 2 of the UCC contains a four-year statute of limitations provision.”
Brandt v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Ctr., 771 N.E.2d 470 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “The trial court granted defendant's motion to dismiss count IV of the amended complaint for failure to meet the pleading requirements of section 2-622 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2-622 (West 1998)) with prejudice.”
In Re Fitch, 174 B.R. 96 (Bankr. S.D. Ill. 1994). “See 810 ILCS 5/2-101 et seq. Section 2-401(1) of the Code provides that while a seller of goods may retain title to such goods after delivery to the buyer, any such retention or reservation of title “is limited in effect to a reservation of a security interest.”
S.N.A. Nut Co. v. Haagen-Dazs Co. (In Re S.N.A. Nut Co.), 247 B.R. 7 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2000). “CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The parties agree that this action is governed by Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (the “UCC”), 810 ILCS 5/2-101 et seq. (hereinafter “UCC § —”).”
Heuerman v. B & M Constr., Inc. Corrected opinion posted 8/3/05 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). · cites it 2× “On appeal, defendant raises these issues: (1) whether the trial court erred by not applying article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (Code) as adopted by the State of Illinois (810 ILCS 5/2-101 et seq. (West 2002)), (2) whether the trial court erred in assessing the amount of…”
MNdustries, Inc. v. MC Mach. Sys., Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2019). “810 ILCS 5/2-101, et seq.; In re: Rust- Oleum Restore Mktg.”
Ali v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2021). “Under the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”), codified in Illinois at 810 ILCS 5/2-101 et seq., “a warranty that the goods shall be merchantable is implied in a contract for their sale if the seller is a merchant with respect to goods of that kind.”
Coolab Foods, LLC v. Creamalicious, Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2023). “) Under the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”), codified in Illinois at 810 ILCS 5/2-101 et seq., “a warranty that the goods shall be merchantable is implied in a contract for their sale if the seller is a merchant with respect to goods of that kind.”
EJ Constr. 1 Corp. v. Pellegrino, 2024 IL App (3d) 240069-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “1 ¶7 The complaint’s sole count asserted a claim under article 2 of the UCC, as adopted in Illinois (810 ILCS 5/2-101 et seq. (West 2022)). The complaint requested, primarily, the van’s 1 The subsequent CARFAX service entry, dated July 30, 2022, reflects an odometer reading that…”
Show all 18 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.