Illinois Compiled Statutes

815 ILCS 385/8 (2026)

Enforcement

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(815 ILCS 385/8) (from Ch. 121 1/2, par. 349.8)

Sec. 8.

Enforcement.

The duty to institute actions for violations of this
Act, including proceedings to restrain and enjoin such violations,
is hereby vested in the Attorney General. The Attorney General may prosecute
business offenses or institute proceedings or both, but the power
to refuse, suspend or revoke a license for a violation of this Act is vested
solely in the Department of Professional Regulation.

This Section shall not be deemed to prohibit the enforcement by any person
of any right provided by this or any other law.

(Source: P.A. 85-1209.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2010–2010 · leading case: Fandel v. Allen, 937 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Fandel v. Allen, 937 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2× “2d at 68 )); Opthalmic Advertising Act (815 ILCS 385/8 (West 2006)) (purpose is to "require advertisers of ophthalmic materials to tell the whole truth to the general public" for the public's protection, safety, and health (815 ILCS 385/1 (West 2006))); Platinum Sales Act (815…”

Fandel v. Allen (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “2d at 68)); Opthalmic Advertising Act (815 ILCS 385/8 (West 2006) (purpose is to "require advertisers of ophthalmic materials to tell the whole truth to the general public" for the public’s protection, safety, and health (815 ILCS 385/1 (West 2006))); Platinum Sales Act (815…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.