Illinois Compiled Statutes
815 ILCS 405/30 (2026)
The Attorney General or the State's Attorney of any county in this State may bring an action in the name of the State against any person to restrain and prevent any violation of this Act
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(815 ILCS 405/30)
(from Ch. 121 1/2, par. 530)
Sec. 30.
The Attorney General or the State's Attorney of any county in this
State may bring an action in the name of the State against any person to
restrain and prevent any violation of this Act. In the enforcement of this
Act, the Attorney General or the State's Attorney may accept an assurance
of discontinuance of any act or practice deemed in violation of this Act
from any person engaging in, or who has engaged in, that act or practice.
Failure to perform the terms of any such assurance constitutes prima facie
proof of a violation of this Act.
(Source: Laws 1967, p. 2149.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2010–2010 · leading case: Fandel v. Allen, 937 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
Fandel v. Allen, 937 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “)); Opthalmic Advertising Act (815 ILCS 385/8 (West 2006)) (purpose is to "require advertisers of ophthalmic materials to tell the whole truth to the general public" for the public's protection, safety, and health (815 ILCS 385/1 (West 2006))); Platinum Sales Act (815 ILCS 395/7…”
Fandel v. Allen (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “2d at 68)); Opthalmic Advertising Act (815 ILCS 385/8 (West 2006) (purpose is to "require advertisers of ophthalmic materials to tell the whole truth to the general public" for the public’s protection, safety, and health (815 ILCS 385/1 (West 2006))); Platinum Sales Act (815…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|