ILCS » Chapter 815 · Act 420
Illinois Compiled Statutes

815 ILCS 420/7 (2026)

Violation of any of the provisions of this Act is an unlawful practice pursuant to Section 2Z of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(815 ILCS 420/7) (from Ch. 121 1/2, par. 1857)
    Sec. 7. Violation of any of the provisions of this Act is an unlawful practice pursuant to Section 2Z of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. All remedies, penalties and authority granted to the Attorney General by that Act shall be available to the Attorney General for the enforcement of this Act. In any action brought by the Attorney General to enforce this Act, the court may order that persons who incurred actual damages be awarded the amount at which actual damages are assessed.
(Source: P.A. 92-16, eff. 6-28-01.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1995–2010 · leading case: Fandel v. Allen, 937 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fandel v. Allen, 937 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2× “1972))); Second-Hand Watch Act (815 ILCS 410/5 (West 2006)); Transportation Ticket Fraud Act (815 ILCS 415/3 (West 2006)); Travel Promotion Consumer Protection Act (815 ILCS 420/7 (West 2006)); Used Lubricant Act (815 ILCS 435/2 (West 2006)); Home Repair Fraud Act (815 ILCS…”
McCoy v. MTI Vacations, Inc., 650 N.E.2d 605 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). “1857 (now 815 ILCS 420/7 (West 1992)).) During the hearing on this issue at trial, Judge Bryant explained that the reason for the reference to the Consumer Fraud Act was that the legislature wanted to reduce the evidentiary proofs required by the Attorney General in Travel Act…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.