Illinois Compiled Statutes

815 ILCS 705/10 (2026)

Registration and Annual Report

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(815 ILCS 705/10) (from Ch. 121 1/2, par. 1710)
    Sec. 10. Registration and Annual Report. No franchisor may sell or offer to sell a franchise in this State if (1) the franchisee is domiciled in this State or (2) the offer of the franchise is made or accepted in this State and the franchise business is or will be located in this State, unless the franchisor has registered the franchise with the Administrator by filing such form of notification and disclosure statement as required under Section 16.
    The registration of a franchise shall become effective on the 21st day after the date of the filing of the required materials, unless the Administrator has denied registration under subdivision (a)(3) of Section 22.
    The registration of a franchise shall expire 120 days after the franchisor's fiscal year end. Annually, but not later than one business day before the registration expires, the franchisor shall file the disclosure statement updated as of the date of the franchisor's prior fiscal year end.
(Source: P.A. 96-648, eff. 10-1-09.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2003–2004 · leading case: Jensen v. Quik Int'l, 820 N.E.2d 462 (Ill. 2004).
Jensen v. Quik Int'l, 820 N.E.2d 462 (Ill. 2004). “” 815 ILCS 705/10 (West 2002). Section 26 provides that: “Any person who offers, sells, terminates, or fails to renew a franchise in violation of this Act shall be liable to the franchisee who may sue for damages caused thereby.”
Jensen v. Quik Int'l, 801 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “” 815 ILCS 705/10 (West 2002). Here, as in Barter Exchange, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant violated the Franchise Disclosure Act by failing to register with the state.”
Jensen v. Quik Int'l (Ill. 2004). “” 815 ILCS 705/10 (West 2002). Section 26 provides that: “Any person who offers, sells, terminates, or fails to renew a franchise in violation of this Act shall be liable to the franchisee who may sue for damages caused thereby.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.