Illinois Compiled Statutes

820 ILCS 40/11 (2026)

This Act shall not be construed to diminish a right of access to records already otherwise provided by law, provided that disclosure of performance evaluations under the Freedom of Information Act shall be prohibited

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(820 ILCS 40/11) (from Ch. 48, par. 2011)
    Sec. 11. This Act shall not be construed to diminish a right of access to records already otherwise provided by law, provided that disclosure of performance evaluations under the Freedom of Information Act shall be prohibited.
(Source: P.A. 96-1483, eff. 12-1-10.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2022 · leading case: Watkins v. McCarthy, 2012 IL App (1st) 100632 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012).
Watkins v. McCarthy, 2012 IL App (1st) 100632 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “” 820 ILCS 40/11 (West 2008). Thus, pursuant to section 11, the Personnel Record Review Act is not a state law which would prohibit the disclosure of information contained in the CR files, to the extent such information may fall within the scope of the Personnel Record Review…”
Fraternal Order of Police v. The City of Chicago, 2016 IL App (1st) 143884 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 3× “" 820 ILCS 40/11 (West 2008). Based on this language, the court determined that the Review Act was not a state law that would prohibit a FOIA disclosure of information contained in CR files.”
Fraternal Order of Police, Chicago Lodge No. 7 v. City of Chicago, 2016 IL App (1st) 143884 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 3× “" 820 ILCS 40/11 (West 2008). Based on this language, the court determined that the Review Act was not a state law that would prohibit a FOIA disclosure of information contained in CR files.”
Williams v. The City of Chicago (N.D. Ill. 2022). “P erformance evaluations 5 ILCS 140/7(1)(a) – Personnel Records Review Act 820 ILCS 40/11 30. C ommand Channel Review 5 ILCS 140/7(1)(f) 31.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.