Illinois Compiled Statutes
820 ILCS 405/2205 (2026)
Judicial review of decisions on contributions
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(820 ILCS 405/2205)
(from Ch. 48, par. 685)
Sec. 2205.
Judicial review of decisions on contributions.
The Circuit Court of the county wherein the hearing provided for in
Sections 2200 and 2201 was held shall have power to review the final
administrative decisions of the Director rendered pursuant to those
Sections. The provisions of the Administrative Review Law, and all
amendments and modifications thereof, and the rules adopted pursuant
thereto, shall apply to and govern all proceedings for the judicial
review of such final administrative decisions of the Director. The term
"administrative decision" is defined as in Section 3-101 of the Code of
Civil Procedure. Such review
proceedings shall be given
precedence over all other civil cases except cases arising under the
Workers' Compensation Act of this State.
The Director shall not be required to certify the record to the
Circuit Court unless the party commencing such proceedings for review
shall pay to the Director the cost of certification of the record as
provided in Section 2200. The Director or the Commissioner of
Unemployment Compensation, in the absence of the Director, upon receipt
of such payment, shall prepare and certify to the court a true and
correct typewritten copy of all matters contained in such record.
The Clerk of any court rendering a decision affecting a decision of
the Director shall promptly furnish the Director with a copy of such
court's decision, without charge, and the Director shall enter an order
in accordance with such decision.
(Source: P.A. 84-1438.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1995–2001 · leading case: Cohen Furniture Co. v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 718 N.E.2d 1058 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999).
Cohen Furniture Co. v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 718 N.E.2d 1058 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “820 ILCS 405/2205 (West 1996); 735 ILCS 5/3-110 (West 1996).”
Marco v. Doherty, 657 N.E.2d 1165 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). “Although the plaintiff had a right to seek review of the Director’s final decision pursuant to section 2205 of the Act (820 ILCS 405/2205 (West 1994)), she did not appeal to the circuit court.”
Nat'l Data Servs. of Chicago, Inc. v. Dir. of Emp. Sec., 746 N.E.2d 40 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “The Director contends that the trial court erred in reversing her decision that the home workers who perform services for plaintiff are employees rather than independent contractors.”
Nat'l Data Servs. of Chicago, Inc. v. Dir. of Emp. Sec. (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “The Director contends that the trial court erred in reversing her decision that the home workers who perform services for plaintiff are employees rather than independent contractors.”
Cohen Furniture Co. v. Dep't of Emp. Sec. (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “820 ILCS 405/2205 (West 1996); 735 ILCS 5/3--110 (West 1996).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|