Illinois Compiled Statutes
820 ILCS 405/806 (2026)
Representation
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(820 ILCS 405/806)
(from Ch. 48, par. 474b)
Sec. 806.
Representation.
Any individual or entity in any proceeding
before the Director or his representative, or the Referee or the Board of
Review, may be represented by a union or any duly authorized agent.
(Source: P.A. 85-956.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1995–2009 · leading case: Grafner v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 914 N.E.2d 520 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009).
Grafner v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 914 N.E.2d 520 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “Thus, based on the entirety of the record, this court is not left with a definite and firm conviction that the Board erred in concluding that the nonattorney representatives did not engage in the unauthorized practice of law.”
Sudzus v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 914 N.E.2d 208 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “Thus, section 806 of the Act provides that “[a]ny individual or entity in any proceeding before the Director or his representative, or the Referee or the Board of Review, may be represented by a union or any duly authorized agent.”
Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 148 v. Illinois Dep't of Emp. Sec., 828 N.E.2d 1104 (Ill. 2005). “” 820 ILCS 405/806 (West 1994). Thus, the Act recognizes the particular relationship between a union and its members, and the benefits to union members of representation by the union.”
Petro v. Bd. of Review Il. Dept. of Empl., 654 N.E.2d 232 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). “Section 806 of the Act provides that "[a]ny individual or entity in any proceeding before the Director or his representative, or the Referee or the Board of Review, may be represented by a union or any duly authorized agent.”
Int'l Union v. DEPT. OF EMP. SEC., 828 N.E.2d 1104 (Ill. 2005). “" 820 ILCS 405/806 (West 1994). Thus, the Act recognizes the particular relationship between a union and its members, and the benefits to union members of representation by the union.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|