Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2 (2026)

Assignment of wages; requisites

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 2. (a) Any assignment of the wages of an employee is valid only if all of the following conditions are satisfied:

(1) The assignment is:

(A) in writing;

(B) signed by the employee personally;

(C) by its terms revocable at any time by the employee upon written notice to the employer; and

(D) agreed to in writing by the employer.

(2) An executed copy of the assignment is delivered to the employer within ten (10) days after its execution.

(3) The assignment is made for a purpose described in subsection (b).

     (b) A wage assignment under this section may be made for the purpose of paying any of the following:

(1) Premium on a policy of insurance obtained for the employee by the employer.

(2) Pledge or contribution of the employee to a charitable or nonprofit organization.

(3) Purchase price of bonds or securities, issued or guaranteed by the United States.

(4) Purchase price of shares of stock, or fractional interests in shares of stock, of the employing company, or of a company owning the majority of the issued and outstanding stock of the employing company, whether purchased from such company, in the open market or otherwise. However, if such shares are to be purchased on installments pursuant to a written purchase agreement, the employee has the right under the purchase agreement at any time before completing purchase of such shares to cancel said agreement and to have repaid promptly the amount of all installment payments which theretofore have been made.

(5) Dues to become owing by the employee to a labor organization of which the employee is a member.

(6) Purchase price of merchandise, goods, or food offered by the employer and sold to the employee, for the employee's benefit, use, or consumption, at the written request of the employee.

(7) Amount of a loan made to the employee by the employer and evidenced by a written instrument executed by the employee subject to the amount limits set forth in section 4(c) of this chapter.

(8) Contributions, assessments, or dues of the employee to a hospital service or a surgical or medical expense plan or to an employees' association, trust, or plan existing for the purpose of paying pensions or other benefits to said employee or to others designated by the employee.

(9) Payment to any credit union, nonprofit organizations, or associations of employees of such employer organized under any law of this state or of the United States.

(10) Payment to any person or organization regulated under the Uniform Consumer Credit Code (IC 24-4.5) for deposit or credit to the employee's account by electronic transfer or as otherwise designated by the employee.

(11) Premiums on policies of insurance and annuities purchased by the employee on the employee's life.

(12) The purchase price of shares or fractional interest in shares in one (1) or more mutual funds.

(13) A judgment owed by the employee if the payment:

(A) is made in accordance with an agreement between the employee and the creditor; and

(B) is not a garnishment under IC 34-25-3.

(14) The purchase, rental, or use of uniforms, shirts, pants, or other job-related clothing at an amount not to exceed the direct cost paid by an employer to an external vendor for those items.

(15) The purchase of equipment or tools necessary to fulfill the duties of employment at an amount not to exceed the direct cost paid by an employer to an external vendor for those items.

(16) Reimbursement for education or employee skills training. However, a wage assignment may not be made if the education or employee skills training benefits were provided, in whole or in part, through an economic development incentive from any federal, state, or local program.

(17) An advance for:

(A) payroll; or

(B) vacation;

pay.

(18) The employee's drug education and addiction treatment services under IC 12-23-23.

     (c) The interest rate charged on amounts loaned or advanced to an employee and repaid under subsection (b) may not exceed the bank prime loan interest rate as reported by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any successor rate, plus four percent (4%).

     (d) The total amount of wages subject to assignment under subsection (b)(14) and (b)(15) may not exceed the lesser of:

(1) two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per year; or

(2) five percent (5%) of the employee's weekly disposable earnings (as defined in IC 24-4.5-5-105(1)(a)).

     (e) Except as provided under 29 CFR Parts 1910, 1915, 1917, 1918, and 1926, an employee shall not be charged or subject to a wage assignment under subsection (b)(14) or (b)(15) for protective equipment including personal protective equipment identified under 29 CFR Parts 1910, 1915, 1917, 1918, and 1926.

Formerly: Acts 1945, c.183, s.2; Acts 1947, c.330, s.1; Acts 1963, c.148, s.1; Acts 1975, P.L.251, SEC.1. As amended by P.L.143-1988, SEC.3; P.L.115-1994, SEC.1; P.L.83-2001, SEC.1; P.L.193-2015, SEC.2; P.L.136-2018, SEC.110; P.L.195-2018, SEC.10; P.L.147-2019, SEC.1.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: Weil v. Metal Techs., Inc., 305 F. Supp. 3d 948 (S.D. Ind. 2018).
Weil v. Metal Techs., Inc., 305 F. Supp. 3d 948 (S.D. Ind. 2018). · cites it 36× “Remaining for resolution at trial, therefore, were the following claims: • The class damages under Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2 resulting from the unlawful wage deductions taken for clothing rental from January 20, 2013 through April 10, 2016; • The class claim under Ind.”
Nass v. State Ex Rel. Unity Team, Local 9212, Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers, 718 N.E.2d 757 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 10× “Voluntary Wage Assignments and Statutory Authorization The Auditor argues she has no legal duty to honor the wage assignments in this case because they are not authorized under Ind.”
Matter of Holland, 21 B.R. 681 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1982). · cites it 6× “Ind.Code Ann. § 22-2-6-2 et seq. (Burns 1974 & Supp.”
Cox v. Town of Rome City, 764 N.E.2d 242 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 4× “Cox states that Rome City violated Indiana Code § 22-2-6-2 (Burns Code Ed. Supp.”
Brian Weil v. Metal Tech., Inc., 925 F.3d 352 (7th Cir. 2019). “See Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2 (a)(1). 3 On appeal, the plaintiffs argue that they were entitled to costs under Indiana law.”
Valadez v. R.T. Enter., Inc., 647 N.E.2d 331 (Ind. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “" I.C. § 22-2-6-2. This language clearly contemplates suits filed solely to secure liquidated damages on late payments.”
Richard D. Wagner, as Tr. for M. Clune Co., Inc., & Donald L. Adams, as Tr. for George Geary Haughton v. United States, 573 F.2d 447 (7th Cir. 1978). “§ 22-2-6-2 (Burns) provides that any assignment of the wages of an employee thereafter made shall not be valid unless specific content and formalistic requirements are met and it is made to pay one of eleven listed purposes such as union dues, premiums on insurance secured by…”
Haxton v. McClure Oil Corp., 697 N.E.2d 1277 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “Indiana Code Section 22-2-6-2(a) defines the requirements for making a deductible assignment of wages: Any assignment of the wages of an employee is valid only if all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) The assignment is: (A) In writing; (B) Signed by the employee…”
Varner v. Indiana Parole Bd., 905 N.E.2d 493 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “In so affirming, the panel interpreted the statute governing voluntary wage assignments, Indiana Code section 22-2-6-2, as requiring the auditor to honor validly executed voluntary wage assignments for fair share payments.”
Fort Wayne Educ. Ass'n, Inc. v. Goetz, 443 N.E.2d 364 (Ind. Ct. App. 1982). “Ind.Code 22-2-6-2(c)(9) authorizes the assignment of wages, pursuant to a properly executed form, “to any .”
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2020). · cites it 40× “There are no Indiana Supreme Court decisions applying § 22-2-6-2, so its inter- pretation here requires an Erie guess.”
Weil v. Metal Tech., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2019). · cites it 29× “FACTUAL BACKGROUND The relevant part of Plaintiffs’ action is the claim based on I.C. § 22-2-6-2, which provides that an employee’s wages can be deducted and assigned if such assignment is: (1) in writing; (2) signed by the employee; (3) by its terms, revocable by the employee…”
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(a) — 8 cases
Weil v. Metal Techs., Inc., 305 F. Supp. 3d 948 (S.D. Ind. 2018). “Remaining for resolution at trial, therefore, were the following claims: • The class damages under Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2 resulting from the unlawful wage deductions taken for clothing rental from January 20, 2013 through April 10, 2016; • The class claim under Ind.”
Nass v. State Ex Rel. Unity Team, Local 9212, Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers, 718 N.E.2d 757 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). “Voluntary Wage Assignments and Statutory Authorization The Auditor argues she has no legal duty to honor the wage assignments in this case because they are not authorized under Ind.”
Haxton v. McClure Oil Corp., 697 N.E.2d 1277 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998). “Indiana Code Section 22-2-6-2(a) defines the requirements for making a deductible assignment of wages: Any assignment of the wages of an employee is valid only if all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) The assignment is: (A) In writing; (B) Signed by the employee…”
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2020). “There are no Indiana Supreme Court decisions applying § 22-2-6-2, so its inter- pretation here requires an Erie guess.”
Weil v. Metal Tech., Inc., 260 F. Supp. 3d 1002 (S.D. Ind. 2017).
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(a)(1) — 2 cases
Cox v. Town of Rome City, 764 N.E.2d 242 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). “Cox states that Rome City violated Indiana Code § 22-2-6-2 (Burns Code Ed. Supp.”
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2020). “There are no Indiana Supreme Court decisions applying § 22-2-6-2, so its inter- pretation here requires an Erie guess.”
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(a)(1)(C) — 1 case
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2020). “There are no Indiana Supreme Court decisions applying § 22-2-6-2, so its inter- pretation here requires an Erie guess.”
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(a)(1)(D) — 1 case
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2020). “There are no Indiana Supreme Court decisions applying § 22-2-6-2, so its inter- pretation here requires an Erie guess.”
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(a)(2) — 1 case
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2020). “There are no Indiana Supreme Court decisions applying § 22-2-6-2, so its inter- pretation here requires an Erie guess.”
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(a)(3) — 1 case
Weil v. Metal Tech., Inc., 260 F. Supp. 3d 1002 (S.D. Ind. 2017).
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(a)(l) — 1 case
Weil v. Metal Tech., Inc., 260 F. Supp. 3d 1002 (S.D. Ind. 2017).
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(a)(l)(D) — 1 case
Weil v. Metal Tech., Inc., 260 F. Supp. 3d 1002 (S.D. Ind. 2017).
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(b) — 4 cases
Nass v. State Ex Rel. Unity Team, Local 9212, Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers, 718 N.E.2d 757 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). “Voluntary Wage Assignments and Statutory Authorization The Auditor argues she has no legal duty to honor the wage assignments in this case because they are not authorized under Ind.”
Weil v. Metal Tech., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2019). “FACTUAL BACKGROUND The relevant part of Plaintiffs’ action is the claim based on I.C. § 22-2-6-2, which provides that an employee’s wages can be deducted and assigned if such assignment is: (1) in writing; (2) signed by the employee; (3) by its terms, revocable by the employee…”
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2020). “There are no Indiana Supreme Court decisions applying § 22-2-6-2, so its inter- pretation here requires an Erie guess.”
Weil v. Metal Tech., Inc., 260 F. Supp. 3d 1002 (S.D. Ind. 2017).
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(b)(10) — 1 case
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2020). “There are no Indiana Supreme Court decisions applying § 22-2-6-2, so its inter- pretation here requires an Erie guess.”
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(b)(14) — 2 cases
Weil v. Metal Tech., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2019). “FACTUAL BACKGROUND The relevant part of Plaintiffs’ action is the claim based on I.C. § 22-2-6-2, which provides that an employee’s wages can be deducted and assigned if such assignment is: (1) in writing; (2) signed by the employee; (3) by its terms, revocable by the employee…”
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2020). “There are no Indiana Supreme Court decisions applying § 22-2-6-2, so its inter- pretation here requires an Erie guess.”
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(b)(5) — 1 case
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(b)(6) — 1 case
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2020). “There are no Indiana Supreme Court decisions applying § 22-2-6-2, so its inter- pretation here requires an Erie guess.”
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(b)(7) — 1 case
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2020). “There are no Indiana Supreme Court decisions applying § 22-2-6-2, so its inter- pretation here requires an Erie guess.”
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(b)(8) — 1 case
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2020). “There are no Indiana Supreme Court decisions applying § 22-2-6-2, so its inter- pretation here requires an Erie guess.”
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(c)(9) — 1 case
Fort Wayne Educ. Ass'n, Inc. v. Goetz, 443 N.E.2d 364 (Ind. Ct. App. 1982). “Ind.Code 22-2-6-2(c)(9) authorizes the assignment of wages, pursuant to a properly executed form, “to any .”
— Ind. Code § 22-2-6-2(d)(2) — 1 case
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc. (S.D. Ind. 2020). “There are no Indiana Supreme Court decisions applying § 22-2-6-2, so its inter- pretation here requires an Erie guess.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.