Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 22-4-14-8 (2026)

Sports; period between seasons

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 8. For weeks of unemployment occurring subsequent to December 31, 1977, benefits may not be paid to any individual on the basis of any service substantially all of which consists of participating in sports or athletic events or training or preparing to participate in these events for any week which commences during the period between two (2) successive sport seasons or similar periods, if the individual performed the services in the first of the seasons or similar periods and there is a reasonable assurance that the individual will perform the services in the second of the seasons or similar periods.

     Benefits may not be denied, however, for any week which commences during the period between two (2) successive sport seasons or similar periods if the individual has performed services in employment other than participating in sports or athletic events or training or preparing to participate in these events with wage credits earned in the other employment during his base period in sufficient amount to qualify under IC 22-4-14-5 and the individual is otherwise eligible. In these cases, the claim shall be computed based on the wage credits earned with employers other than those employing the individual in sports or athletic events reported for the individual during his base period and in accordance with IC 22-4-12-2 and IC 22-4-12-4. Benefits paid based on this computation shall be only for weeks of unemployment occurring between sport seasons or similar periods. For any weeks of unemployment claimed other than between sports seasons or similar periods, the claims of these individuals shall be recomputed to include all base period wages.

As added by Acts 1977, P.L.262, SEC.23.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1987–2014 · leading case: Indiana State Univ. v. LaFief, 888 N.E.2d 184 (Ind. 2008).
Indiana State Univ. v. LaFief, 888 N.E.2d 184 (Ind. 2008). · cites it 4× “§ 22-4-14-7(a) (individuals employed by educational institutions are not entitled to unemployment benefits during the period between two successive academic years if they were employed during one period and there is a reasonable assurance that they will be employed during the…”
James Broxton v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Dep't of Workforce Dev., the Dep't of Indiana Workforce Dev., & Sodexo, 999 N.E.2d 1069 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code Ann. § 22-4-14-7(a) (individuals employed by educational institutions are not entitled to unemployment benefits during the period between two successive academic years if they were employed during one period and there is a reasonable assurance that they will be…”
Briggs v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Dep't of Workforce Dev., 648 N.E.2d 1225 (Ind. Ct. App. 1995). “CODE § 22-4-14-8(a). We eannot agree with the Board's contention that the Employment Security Act was intended to categorically exclude from its coverage temporarily unemployed persons such as Orion's employees.”
Trelleborg YSH, Inc. v. Bd. of Indiana Dep't of Workforce Dev., 798 N.E.2d 484 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). “§ 22-4-14-8. Thereafter, Chapter 15 specifies various Disqualifications for Benefits.”
M.M. v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Dep't of Workforce Dev., 921 N.E.2d 16 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “See I.C. § 22-4-14-8(b). Accordingly, we affirm the Review Board's decision that M.”
Carey v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Emp. Sec. Div., 505 N.E.2d 111 (Ind. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “ISSUE The issue presented for our determination is whether, upon the facts of this case, Carey was engaged in self-employment to the extent he was not unemployed and not available for work and thereby ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits.”
Wallace v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Emp. Sec. Div., 510 N.E.2d 1371 (Ind. Ct. App. 1987). “CODE § 22-4-14-8(a) (1986 Supp.) sets out specific criteria for eligibility for unemployment compensation: "Sec.”
T.W. v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Dep't of Workforce Dev., 952 N.E.2d 312 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “See I.C. § 22-4-14-8(b) (“An unemployed individual shall be eligible to receive benefits with respect to any week only if the individual .”
— Ind. Code § 22-4-14-8(a) — 2 cases
Briggs v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Dep't of Workforce Dev., 648 N.E.2d 1225 (Ind. Ct. App. 1995). “CODE § 22-4-14-8(a). We eannot agree with the Board's contention that the Employment Security Act was intended to categorically exclude from its coverage temporarily unemployed persons such as Orion's employees.”
Wallace v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Emp. Sec. Div., 510 N.E.2d 1371 (Ind. Ct. App. 1987). “CODE § 22-4-14-8(a) (1986 Supp.) sets out specific criteria for eligibility for unemployment compensation: "Sec.”
— Ind. Code § 22-4-14-8(b) — 2 cases
M.M. v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Dep't of Workforce Dev., 921 N.E.2d 16 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). “See I.C. § 22-4-14-8(b). Accordingly, we affirm the Review Board's decision that M.”
T.W. v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Dep't of Workforce Dev., 952 N.E.2d 312 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011). “See I.C. § 22-4-14-8(b) (“An unemployed individual shall be eligible to receive benefits with respect to any week only if the individual .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.