Sec. 8. In case of contumacy by, or refusal to obey a
subpoena issued to, any person in the administration of this article, any
court of this state within the jurisdiction of which the inquiry is carried
on or within the jurisdiction of which said person guilty of contumacy
or refusal to obey is found or resides or transacts business, upon
application by the department, the review board, or a duly authorized
representative of either of these, shall have jurisdiction to issue to such
person an order requiring such person to appear before the department,
the review board, an administrative law judge, or the duly authorized
representative of any of these, there to produce evidence if so ordered,
or there to give testimony touching the matter in question or under
investigation. Any failure to obey such order of the court may be
punished by said court as a contempt thereof.
Formerly: Acts 1947, c.208, s.1808. As amended by
P.L.135-1990, SEC.12; P.L.108-2006, SEC.33; P.L.171-2016,
SEC.16.
Notes of Decisions
S.S. v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Dep't of Workforce Dev., 941 N.E.2d 550 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 4× “Ind. Code § 22-4-17-8 .5(b)(4). Each party to the hearing must be mailed a notice of the hearing at least ten days before the scheduled date, specifying the date, place, and time of the hearing and identifying the issues to be decided.”
J.W.B. v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Dep't of Workforce Dev., 952 N.E.2d 843 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 2× “” Ind.Code § 22-4-17-8. We therefore reverse the decision of the ALJ and the Review Board and remand the matter with instructions to the Review Board to grant Bond a hearing upon due notice.”
Forrest Perkins v. Mem'l Hosp. of South Bend (Ind. 2020).
· cites it 2× “Second, once subpoenaed by a hearing officer, an individual must, by statute, comply with the subpoena, I.C. § 22-4-17-8 (2006) (failing to obey an “order of the court may be punished by said court as a contempt thereof”), and he ultimately commits a misdemeanor if he refuses to…”
Forrest Perkins v. Mem'l Hosp. of South Bend (Ind. 2020).
· cites it 2× “Second, once subpoenaed by a hearing officer, an individual must, by statute, comply with the subpoena, I.C. § 22-4-17-8 (2006) (failing to obey an “order of the court may be punished by said court as a contempt thereof”), and he ultimately commits a misdemeanor if he refuses to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.