Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 23-1-30-2 (2026)

Shares entitled to vote

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 2. (a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) or unless the articles of incorporation provide otherwise, each outstanding share, regardless of class, is entitled to one (1) vote on each matter voted on at a shareholders' meeting. Only shares are entitled to vote.

     (b) Absent special circumstances, the shares of a corporation are not entitled to vote if they are owned, directly or indirectly, by a second corporation, domestic or foreign, and the first corporation owns, directly or indirectly, a majority of the shares entitled to vote for directors of the second corporation.

     (c) Subsection (b) does not limit the power of a corporation to vote any shares, including its own shares, held by it in or for an employee benefit plan or in any other fiduciary capacity.

     (d) Redeemable shares are not entitled to vote after notice of redemption is mailed to the holders and a sum sufficient to redeem the shares has been deposited with a bank, trust company, or other financial institution under an irrevocable obligation to pay the holders the redemption price on surrender of the shares.

As added by P.L.149-1986, SEC.14.

 

Notes of Decisions
Corre Opportunities Fund, LP v. Emmis Commc'ns Corp., 892 F. Supp. 2d 1076 (S.D. Ind. 2012). · cites it 6× “Indiana Code § 23-1-30-2 a. Stock acquired through TRS transactions 9 Plaintiffs argue that Defendants cannot vote the shares of Preferred Stock they acquired through total return swaps because they are no longer “outstanding” as defined by Indiana statute.”
— Ind. Code § 23-1-30-2(b) — 1 case
— Ind. Code § 23-1-30-2(c) — 1 case
Corre Opportunities Fund, LP v. Emmis Commc'ns Corp., 892 F. Supp. 2d 1076 (S.D. Ind. 2012). “Indiana Code § 23-1-30-2 a. Stock acquired through TRS transactions 9 Plaintiffs argue that Defendants cannot vote the shares of Preferred Stock they acquired through total return swaps because they are no longer “outstanding” as defined by Indiana statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.