Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 29-3-1-13 (2026)
"Protected person"
✓ current as of May 2026
Sec. 13. "Protected person" means an individual for whom a guardian has been appointed or with respect to whom a protective order has been issued.
As added by P.L.169-1988, SEC.1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: Lillian Parsley, as the Guardian, Grandparent, & Next Friend of Robert Parsley v. MGA Fam. Grp., Inc., H Props. LLP, Mark Snedeker, & Video Tech/Direct Maytag HAC, 103 N.E.3d 651 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018).
Lillian Parsley, as the Guardian, Grandparent, & Next Friend of Robert Parsley v. MGA Fam. Grp., Inc., H Props. LLP, Mark Snedeker, & Video Tech/Direct Maytag HAC, 103 N.E.3d 651 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018). “Also, the phrase "protected person" used in Indiana Code section 34-23-2-1(c)(3) is defined in Indiana Code section 29-3-1-13 (1989) as "an individual for whom a guardian has been appointed or with respect to whom a protective order has been issued.”
City of Mishawaka v. Kvale, 810 N.E.2d 1129 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). “"); and Ind.Code § 29-3-1-13 (defining a "protected person" as "an individual for whom a guardian has been appointed or with respect to whom a protective order has been issued").”
Foman v. Moss, 681 N.E.2d 1113 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997). “CODE § 29-3-1-13 as "an individual for whom a guardian has been appointed or with respect to whom a protective order has been issued.”
In the Matter of the Supervised Est. of Donald L. Moster, Sr., Lisa Voltz, Successor Pers. Rep., & Donald L. Moster, Jr. v. Rose M. Deschand (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). “” Ind. Code § 29-3-1-13 . Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 20A-ES-938 | September 25, 2020 Page 14 of 15 trial court did not err when it denied Voltz’s motion to void the marriage between Rose and Donald in Cause ES-110.”
Est. of Judah Morgan v. Alan Morgan (Ind. Ct. App. 2025). “3d at 656 (quoting Ind. Code § 29-3-1-13 ). Judah’s Estate is not an individual; thus, it cannot be a “protected person” under the CWDS’s guardian provision no matter how “guardian” is defined.”
Loveless v. State, 896 N.E.2d 918 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). “Ind.Code § 29-3-1-13. Loveless does not di *921 rect us to evidence in the record she was such a "protected person.”
Guardianship: Michael L. Parkinson v. Heidi Smith (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). “Code § 29-3-1-13 (emphasis added). With respect to protective orders, Indiana Code section 29-3-4-1 provides that (a) Upon petition by any person and after a hearing under IC 29- 3-5, the court may issue, without the appointment of a guardian, any protective order for the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.