Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 32-23-11-7 (2026)
Trail use condition imposed
✓ current as of May 2026
Sec. 7. A right-of-way is not considered abandoned if the Interstate Commerce Commission or the United States Surface Transportation Board imposes on the right-of-way a trail use condition under 16 U.S.C. 1247(d).
[Pre-2002 Recodification Citation: 32-5-12-7.]
As added by P.L.2-2002, SEC.8.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2011–2020 · leading case: Howard v. United States, 964 N.E.2d 779 (Ind. 2012).
Howard v. United States, 964 N.E.2d 779 (Ind. 2012). “Ind.Code § 32-23-11-7 ("A right-of-way is not considered abandoned if the [ICC] or [STB] imposes on the right-of-way a trail use condition under 16 U.”
Howard v. United States, 106 Fed. Cl. 343 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “Ind. Code § 32-23-11-7 (“A right-of-way is not considered abandoned if the [ICC] 9 or [STB] imposes on the right-of-way a trail use condition under 16 U.”
Howard v. United States, 100 Fed. Cl. 230 (Fed. Cl. 2011). “Rule 64 provides for requests for certification “when it appears to the federal court that a proceeding presents an issue of state law that is determinative of the case and on which there is no clear controlling Indiana precedent.” Ind. R.App. Proc. R. 64(A).”
Memmer v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2020). “” 17 Ind. Code § 32-23-11-7 ; see also 16 U.S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.