Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 34-24-2-4 (2026)

Seizure of property subject to forfeiture; requisites; custody; limitation of actions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 4. (a) Property subject to forfeiture under this chapter shall be seized by a law enforcement officer upon court order. Seizure may be made without a court order only if:

(1) the seizure is incident to a lawful arrest or search, or to an inspection under an administrative inspection warrant; or

(2) the property subject to seizure has been the subject of a prior judgment in favor of the state in a forfeiture proceeding under this chapter (or IC 34-4-30.5 before its repeal).

     (b) When property is seized under subsection (a), pending forfeiture and final disposition, the law enforcement officer making the seizure may:

(1) place the property under seal;

(2) remove the property to a place designated by the court; or

(3) require another agency authorized by law to take custody of the property and remove it to an appropriate location.

     (c) Property seized under subsection (a) (or IC 34-4-30.5-4(a) before its repeal) is not subject to replevin, but is considered to be in the custody of the law enforcement officer making the seizure, subject only to order of the court. However, if a seizure of property is made in accordance with subsection (a), the prosecuting attorney or the inspector general shall bring an action for forfeiture under section 2 of this chapter within:

(1) thirty (30) days after receiving notice from any person claiming a right, title, or interest in the property; or

(2) one hundred eighty (180) days after the property is seized;

whichever occurs first.

     (d) If an action under subsection (c) is not filed within thirty (30) days after receiving notice from any person claiming a right, title, or interest in the property, the claimant:

(1) is entitled to file a complaint seeking:

(A) replevin;

(B) foreclosure; or

(C) other appropriate remedy; and

(2) shall immediately obtain a hearing on the complaint as provided in subsection (f).

If an action is not filed within one hundred eighty (180) days after the date of the seizure, and the property has not been previously released to an innocent person under section 5 of this chapter (or IC 34-4-30.5-4.5 before its repeal), the law enforcement agency whose officer made the seizure shall return the property to its owner.

     (e) If property is seized under subsection (a) (or IC 34-4-30.5-4(a) before its repeal) and the property is a vehicle or real property, the prosecuting attorney or the inspector general shall serve, within thirty (30) days after the date the property is seized and as provided by the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure, notice of seizure upon each person whose right, title, or interest is of record in the bureau of motor vehicles, in the county recorder's office, or other office authorized to receive or record vehicle or real property ownership interests.

     (f) The person whose right, title, or interest is of record may at any time file a complaint seeking:

(1) replevin;

(2) foreclosure; or

(3) another appropriate remedy;

to which the state may answer in forfeiture within the appropriate statutory period. The court shall promptly set the matter for a hearing, and in the case of replevin or foreclosure, the court shall set the hearing as provided by the applicable statutory provisions.

[Pre-1998 Recodification Citation: 34-4-30.5-4.]

As added by P.L.1-1998, SEC.19. Amended by P.L.222-2005, SEC.42.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1999–2012 · leading case: Warriner v. Dc Marshall Jeep, 962 N.E.2d 1263 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012).
Warriner v. Dc Marshall Jeep, 962 N.E.2d 1263 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 4× “Unable to continue his suit against the manufacturer, Warriner sued the dealership that leased him the car in strict liability as a statutory manufacturer under Indiana Code section 34-24-2-4 that allows a plaintiff to sue the principal distributor or seller of a product if the…”
Mendenhall v. City of Indianapolis, 717 N.E.2d 1218 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “5-4 (now Indiana Code section 34-24-2-4). R. 274. On August 3, 1983, IPD officers padlocked Mendenhall’s building and denied both him and Gorelick access to the building and its contents.”
Wee Scots, LLC v. Fleming, 765 N.E.2d 668 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code § 34-24-2-4. Here, subsequent to filing her complaint, Fleming filed a verified motion for *671 pre-judgment attachment, a written undertaking, 1 and an affidavit, in which she alleged, in part: The plaintiff's claim in the above-captioned cause of action is for the…”
Jeremy K. Warriner v. DC Marshall Jeep a/k/a DC Marshall, Inc. (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “Unable to continue his suit against the manufacturer, Warriner sued the dealership that leased him the car in strict liability as a statutory manufacturer under Indiana Code section 34-24-2-4 that allows a plaintiff to sue the principal distributor or seller of a product if the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.