Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 35-32-2-4 (2026)
Aiding and abetting; conspiracy; attempts
✓ current as of May 2026
Sec. 4. (a) If a person in a county engages in conduct sufficient to constitute aiding, inducing, or causing an offense committed in another county, he may be tried for the offense in either county.
(b) In a prosecution for conspiracy to commit a felony, any or all offenders may be tried in the county in which:
(1) the agreement was made; or
(2) any overt act in furtherance of the agreement is performed.
(c) In a prosecution for an attempt to commit a crime, the offender may be tried in any county in which:
(1) a substantial step towards the commission of the underlying crime occurred; or
(2) the underlying crime was to have been completed.
As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1988–2004 · leading case: Kindred v. State, 540 N.E.2d 1161 (Ind. 1989).
Kindred v. State, 540 N.E.2d 1161 (Ind. 1989). “Code § 85-82-2-5(a) and (c) and Ind.Code § 35-32-2-4(c)(2). He now challenges the trial court's denial of that motion.”
Smith v. State, 809 N.E.2d 938 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). “Ind.Code § 35-32-2-4(b) provides: In a prosecution for conspiracy to commit a felony, any or all offenders may be tried in the county in which: (1) the agreement was made; or (2) any overt act in furtherance of the agreement is performed.”
Gregory v. State, 524 N.E.2d 275 (Ind. 1988). “Ind. Code § 35-32-2-4 specifically provides for the prosecution of co-conspirators in any county in which: "1) a substantial step towards the commission of the underlying crime occurred; or 2) the underlying crime was to have been completed.”
— Ind. Code § 35-32-2-4(b) — 1 case
Smith v. State, 809 N.E.2d 938 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). “Ind.Code § 35-32-2-4(b) provides: In a prosecution for conspiracy to commit a felony, any or all offenders may be tried in the county in which: (1) the agreement was made; or (2) any overt act in furtherance of the agreement is performed.”
— Ind. Code § 35-32-2-4(c)(2) — 1 case
Kindred v. State, 540 N.E.2d 1161 (Ind. 1989). “Code § 85-82-2-5(a) and (c) and Ind.Code § 35-32-2-4(c)(2). He now challenges the trial court's denial of that motion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.