Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 35-45-2-4 (2026)
Unlawful disclosure
✓ current as of May 2026
Sec. 4. (a) This section does not apply to an employee who discloses information under IC 35-33.5.
(b) An employee of a telegraph company who knowingly or intentionally discloses the contents of a message sent or received, to a person other than a sender or receiver or authorized agent of either, commits unlawful disclosure, a Class A infraction.
(c) An employee of a telephone company who knowingly or intentionally discloses the contents of a conversation over a line of the company commits unlawful disclosure, a Class A infraction.
As added by Acts 1977, P.L.26, SEC.23. Amended by P.L.161-1990, SEC.4.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1999–2017 · leading case: Boehner, John A. v. McDermott, James A., 191 F.3d 463 (D.C. Cir. 1999).
Boehner, John A. v. McDermott, James A., 191 F.3d 463 (D.C. Cir. 1999). “5/14-2 (1993); Ind.Code Ann. § 35-45-2-4 (West 1994) (limiting criminal disclosure liability to telecommunications employees); Iowa Code §§ 808B.”
Gerald Edward Johnson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2016). “Code § 35-42-2-1 (g)(2); Count II, intimidation, a Level 5 felony, I.C. § 35-45-2-4(a)(2);-(b)(2)(A); and his adjudication as a habitual offender, I.”
Milana Staletovich Riggs v. Cynthia Hill, in her capacity as the Pers. Rep. of the Est. of Leon O. Riggs, 84 N.E.3d 699 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017). “” Ind. Code § 35-45-2-4 (d). Our .Supreme Court has explained that this statute “establishes as a matter of legislative policy that claimants to the estate of a deceased person should not be permitted to present a court with their version of their dealings with the decedent.”
— Ind. Code § 35-45-2-4(a)(2) — 1 case
Gerald Edward Johnson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2016). “Code § 35-42-2-1 (g)(2); Count II, intimidation, a Level 5 felony, I.C. § 35-45-2-4(a)(2);-(b)(2)(A); and his adjudication as a habitual offender, I.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.