Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 36-1-2-23 (2026)
"Unit"
✓ current as of May 2026
Sec. 23. "Unit" means county, municipality, or township.
[Local Government Recodification Citation: New.]
As added by Acts 1980, P.L.211, SEC.1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35
cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case: Siwinski v. Town of Ogden Dunes, 949 N.E.2d 825 (Ind. 2011).
Siwinski v. Town of Ogden Dunes, 949 N.E.2d 825 (Ind. 2011). “" Ind.Code § 36-1-2-23 (2007). Furthermore, municipality means "city or town.”
City of North Vernon v. Jennings Nw. Reg'l Utils., 829 N.E.2d 1 (Ind. 2005). “" Ind.Code § 36-1-2-23. 2 . See, eg., Indiana Code section 13-26-2-10(b)(3), which provides in relevant part, "[Ilf an eligible entity" has territory within the proposed district, the order establishing a regional district must "contain provisions protecting the investments of…”
Sow v. Fortville Police Dep't, 636 F.3d 293 (7th Cir. 2011). “See Martin v. Fort Wayne Police Dep’t, 2010 WL 4876728 , at *3 (N.”
Anderson v. Gaudin, 42 N.E.3d 82 (Ind. 2015). “See Ind.Code § 36-1-2-23 (" ‘Unit’ means county, municipality, or township.”
City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 878 N.E.2d 358 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). “Ind.Code § 36-1-2-23. "Funds received by a unit under a development agreement are public funds[.”
Town of Plainfield v. Town of Avon, 757 N.E.2d 705 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001). “…4 . The Home Rule Act applies to all "units." Ind.Code § 36-1-3-1. A "unit" is a county, municipality, or township. Ind.Code § 36-1-2-23.”
Town of Avon v. West Cent. Conservancy Dist., 957 N.E.2d 598 (Ind. 2011). “See Indiana Code § 36-1-2-23 (2007). The WCCD, of course, is not a "unit.”
Sanders v. Bd. of Comm'rs of Brown Cnty., 892 N.E.2d 1249 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). “…may provide facilities and equipment for that system.” A unit is defined as a “county, municipality, or township.” Ind.Code § 36-1-2-23 (2006).”
Foor v. Town of Hebron, 742 N.E.2d 545 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001). “” Ind.Code § 36-1-2-23; Therefore, the Safety Board Discipline Statute required Foor to name the “Town of Hebron” as the defendant.”
Creekmore v. State, 858 N.E.2d 230 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006). “§ 36-1-2-23, was authorized to collect a fee for processing dishonored checks pursuant to "Kosciusko County, Ind.”
Schlehuser v. City of Seymour, 674 N.E.2d 1009 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996). “CODE § 36-1-2-23. The BZA is not a “unit” under the Act but is an administrative agency established under the zoning ordinance adopted by the City of Seymour.”
Castetter v. Twp., 959 N.E.2d 837 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011). ““ ‘Unit’ means county, municipality, or township,” I.C. § 36-1-2-23, and in this case refers to Lawrence Township.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.