Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 36-7-4-615 (2026)
Repealed
✓ current as of May 2026
As added by P.L.320-1995, SEC.9. Repealed by P.L.126-2011, SEC.68.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2003–2006 · leading case: Hoosier Outdoor Advert. Corp. v. RBL Mgmt., Inc., 844 N.E.2d 157 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006).
Hoosier Outdoor Advert. Corp. v. RBL Mgmt., Inc., 844 N.E.2d 157 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006). “Ultimately, the court held that "conditions" attached to the approval of a planned unit development ("PUD") need not be recorded with the county recorder in order to be binding on a subsequent purchaser of the property so long as the conditions are available in the public…”
Story Bed & Breakfast, LLP v. Brown Cnty. Area Plan Comm'n, 789 N.E.2d 13 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). “Ind.Code § 36-7-4-615 (1997). 8 . Because a legislature may "require" a commitment, there is a strong legislative aspect to commitments, and it would be error to characterize commitments as entirely contractual-contracts must be entered into voluntarily.”
— Ind. Code § 36-7-4-615(C) — 1 case
Hoosier Outdoor Advert. Corp. v. RBL Mgmt., Inc., 844 N.E.2d 157 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006). “Ultimately, the court held that "conditions" attached to the approval of a planned unit development ("PUD") need not be recorded with the county recorder in order to be binding on a subsequent purchaser of the property so long as the conditions are available in the public…”
— Ind. Code § 36-7-4-615(a)(2)(4) — 1 case
Story Bed & Breakfast, LLP v. Brown Cnty. Area Plan Comm'n, 789 N.E.2d 13 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). “Ind.Code § 36-7-4-615 (1997). 8 . Because a legislature may "require" a commitment, there is a strong legislative aspect to commitments, and it would be error to characterize commitments as entirely contractual-contracts must be entered into voluntarily.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.