Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 4-33-6-10 (2026)

Riverboat operation; license expiration

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 10. (a) An owner's license issued under this chapter permits the holder to own and operate one (1) riverboat and equipment for each license.

(b) Except as provided in subsections (c) and (d), an owner's license issued under this chapter must specify the place where the riverboat must operate and dock.

(c) The commission may permit a riverboat to dock at a temporary dock in the applicable city for a specific period of time not to exceed one (1) year after the owner's license is issued.

(d) An owner's license issued with respect to a riverboat constructed under section 24 of this chapter must specify the site of the riverboat.

(e) An owner's initial license expires five (5) years after the effective date of the license.

As added by P.L.277-1993(ss), SEC.124. Amended by P.L.192-2002(ss), SEC.13; P.L.255-2015, SEC.10; P.L.268-2017, SEC.21.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2009 · leading case: City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 908 N.E.2d 611 (Ind. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 908 N.E.2d 611 (Ind. 2009). · cites it 2× “Before that date arrived, Showboat desired to transfer the license to Harrah's, and the City and various other parties entered into a series of subsequent agreements in 1998 and 1999, which effectively allowed the City to reaffirm the original agreements.”

City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 878 N.E.2d 358 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 4× “Ind.Code § 4-33-6-10(c) (1993) (ss). The parties also were aware that the license was issued to a gaming concern rather than the City or any other local entity.”

— Ind. Code § 4-33-6-10(c) — 1 case

City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 878 N.E.2d 358 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). “Ind.Code § 4-33-6-10(c) (1993) (ss). The parties also were aware that the license was issued to a gaming concern rather than the City or any other local entity.”

— Ind. Code § 4-33-6-10(d) — 1 case

City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 908 N.E.2d 611 (Ind. 2009). “Before that date arrived, Showboat desired to transfer the license to Harrah's, and the City and various other parties entered into a series of subsequent agreements in 1998 and 1999, which effectively allowed the City to reaffirm the original agreements.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.