Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 4-35-3-4 (2026)
Legislative intent
✓ current as of May 2026
Sec. 4. This article will maintain the public's confidence and trust through:
(1) comprehensive law enforcement supervision; and
(2) the strict regulation of facilities, persons, associations, and gambling games at racetracks under this article.
As added by P.L.233-2007, SEC.21.
IC 4-35-4Chapter 4. Powers and Duties of the Indiana Gaming Commission
4-35-4-1Administration, regulation, and enforcement of
slot machine wagering at racetracks
4-35-4-2Rules; violations; fees and penalties; voluntary
exclusion program
4-35-4-3Rules
4-35-4-4Gaming agent duties
4-35-4-5Gaming agents; salaries and expenses; worker's
compensation fee
4-35-4-5.1Application of 2016 amendments
4-35-4-6Contract with Indiana horse racing commission
authorized
4-35-4-7Licensing standards
4-35-4-8Records of licensee
4-35-4-9Ejection or exclusion from facilities
4-35-4-10Violations of article; fraudulent acts
4-35-4-11Investigative procedures; complaints
4-35-4-12Display of toll free telephone number
4-35-4-13Prohibition of fee for proposed transfer of
ownership
4-35-4-13.2Model power of attorney
4-35-4-14Appointment of temporary trustee
4-35-4-15Civil penalties for violations concerning a power
of attorney
4-35-4-16Withholding delinquent child support from
winnings; fee; notice; priority of order over other
claims
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2017–2017 · leading case: Thomas P. Donovan v. Hoosier Park, LLC d/b/a Hoosier Park, Racing & Casino, Centaur, Inc., Hoosier Park, L.P., Centaur Holdings, LLC, & Terrance Sollars, 84 N.E.3d 1198 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017).
Thomas P. Donovan v. Hoosier Park, LLC d/b/a Hoosier Park, Racing & Casino, Centaur, Inc., Hoosier Park, L.P., Centaur Holdings, LLC, & Terrance Sollars, 84 N.E.3d 1198 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017). “]” Ind. Code § 4-35-3-4 (2007). The Legislature granted the IGC the authority and duty to administer, regulate, and enforce the system of gambling games at racetracks.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.