Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 5-22-19-2 (2026)

Petition for judicial review; filing; relief

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 2. (a) A person aggrieved by a determination under this article may file a petition for judicial review of that determination in a court of appropriate jurisdiction.

     (b) The court shall grant relief only if it determines that a person seeking judicial relief has been substantially prejudiced by a determination that is any of the following:

(1) Arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.

(2) Contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity.

(3) In excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right.

(4) Without observance of procedure required by law.

(5) Unsupported by substantial evidence.

As added by P.L.49-1997, SEC.1.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2006–2019 · leading case: Midwest Psychological Ctr., Inc. v. Indiana Dep't of Admin., 959 N.E.2d 896 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011).
Midwest Psychological Ctr., Inc. v. Indiana Dep't of Admin., 959 N.E.2d 896 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 14× “Midwest appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in granting the motions because Midwest has standing as an aggrieved person under Indiana Code Section 5-22-19-2. We conclude that Midwest is not aggrieved and therefore does not have standing to challenge either the…”
City of Fort Wayne v. Pierce Mfg., Inc., 853 N.E.2d 508 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “Ind.Code § 5-22-19-2. Further, (a) If the court finds that a person has been substantially prejudiced by a determination, the court may set aside the determination.”
Sanitary Dist. of the City of Hammond, Indiana & the City of Hammond, Indiana v. Town of Griggith, Indiana Town of Highland, Indiana, 39 N.E.3d 400 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 8× “Ind. Code § 5-22-19-2 . I would reverse and remand for the trial court to review the District’s determination accordingly.”
Happy Valley LLC v. Madison Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners (Ind. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “The trial court treated the affirmative defense of failure to act in good faith as a free-standing tort claim and observed that 3 Indiana Code Section 5-22-19-2 provides that a person aggrieved by a determination under the Purchasing Act may file a petition for judicial review.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.