Sec. 6. "Authorized emergency vehicle" means the
following:
(1) The following vehicles:
(A) Fire department vehicles.
(B) Police department vehicles.
(C) Ambulances.
(D) Emergency vehicles operated by or for hospitals or health
and hospital corporations under IC 16-22-8.
(2) Vehicles designated as emergency vehicles by the Indiana
department of transportation under IC 9-21-20-1.
(3) Motor vehicles that, subject to IC 9-21-20-2, are approved by
the Indiana emergency medical services commission that are:
(A) ambulances that are owned by persons, firms, limited
liability companies, or corporations other than hospitals; or
(B) not ambulances and that provide emergency medical
services, including extrication and rescue services (as defined
in IC 16-18-2-110).
(4) Vehicles of the department of correction that, subject to IC 9-21-20-3, are:
(A) designated by the department of correction as emergency
vehicles; and
(B) responding to an emergency.
[Pre-1991 Recodification Citation: 9-4-1-2(d).]
As added by P.L.2-1991, SEC.1. Amended by P.L.1-1992,
SEC.35; P.L.2-1993, SEC.64; P.L.8-1993, SEC.165.
Notes of Decisions
Quakenbush v. Lackey, 622 N.E.2d 1284 (Ind. 1993).
· cites it 2× “Code § 9-13-2-6 and Ind. Code § 9-21-1-8 , this Court's task in Seymour should have been to determine to what extent, if any, the legislature intended Section 3(7) to alter the common law right of citizens to seek recovery for the breach of this private duty.”
East Chicago Police Dep't v. Bynum, 826 N.E.2d 22 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 2× “…for the safety of all persons using the highway.” 8 . A police department vehicle is an authorized emergency vehicle. Ind.Code § 9-13-2-6(1)(B).”
Patrick v. Miresso, 821 N.E.2d 856 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 3× “§ 9-13-2-6. The court determined that summary judgment was inappropriate because there was a question of fact, namely if the officer was negligent in the operation of his vehicle.”
Belding v. Town of New Whiteland, 622 N.E.2d 1291 (Ind. 1993).
· cites it 2× “§ 9-13-2-6 (1)(B) (West Supp. 1992), and the operators of emergency vehicles are, under certain circumstances, exempted from complying with the rules of the road, Ind.”
— Ind. Code § 9-13-2-6(1)(B) — 2 cases
East Chicago Police Dep't v. Bynum, 826 N.E.2d 22 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005).
“…for the safety of all persons using the highway.” 8 . A police department vehicle is an authorized emergency vehicle. Ind.Code § 9-13-2-6(1)(B).”
Patrick v. Miresso, 821 N.E.2d 856 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005).
“§ 9-13-2-6. The court determined that summary judgment was inappropriate because there was a question of fact, namely if the officer was negligent in the operation of his vehicle.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.