Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 9-26-1-8 (2026)
Repealed
✓ current as of May 2026
[Pre-1991 Recodification Citation: 9-4-1-40(b).]
As added by P.L.2-1991, SEC.14. Amended by P.L.96-1996, SEC.2; P.L.97-1996, SEC.2; P.L.126-2008, SEC.7; P.L.158-2013, SEC.158. Repealed by P.L.217-2014, SEC.109.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23
cases, 1996–2016 · leading case: State v. Gradison, 758 N.E.2d 1008 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001).
State v. Gradison, 758 N.E.2d 1008 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001). “1 Issue The State presents the following restated issue for our review: whether the trial court erroneously granted Gradison's motion for judgment on the evidence under an improper interpretation of Indiana Code section 9-26-1-8. Facts and Procedural History On June 23, 2000,…”
Fredy Sanchez v. Eric Holder, Jr., 757 F.3d 712 (7th Cir. 2014). “The printout states that in October 2009, Sanchez pleaded guilty to one count of a violation of Ind.Code § 9-26-1-8, “Failure to stop and remain at scene of accident resulting in injury or death.”
Barton v. State, 936 N.E.2d 842 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). “Ind.Code § 9-26-1-8; Barber v. State, 863 N.”
Armstrong v. State, 848 N.E.2d 1088 (Ind. 2006). “I.C. § 9-26-1-8. In Honeycutt , three brothers were driving home together after visiting several bars.”
Barber v. State, 863 N.E.2d 1199 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). “Ind.Code § 9-26-1-8(a)(2). 4 . Because Barber committed his offenses before the 2005 amendments to the sentencing statutes, we operate under the former presumptive scheme.”
Orta v. State, 940 N.E.2d 370 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011). “Ind.Code § 9-26-1-8 (2008). 4 . Orta's claim that there was no evidence in the record suggesting that he was voluntarily intoxicated seems disingenuous in light of the evidence demonstrating that, at the time of the incident, Orta's blood alcohol content ("BAC") was .”
Abney v. State, 811 N.E.2d 415 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). “Ind.Code § 9-26-1-8(a)(2) (1998). 6 . A chemical test "means an analysis of a person's blood, breath, urine, or other bodily *420 substance for the determination of the presence of alcohol, a controlled substance, or a drug.”
Gregory Hudson v. State of Indiana, 20 N.E.3d 900 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). “Ind.Code § 9-26-1-8; Barton v. State, 936 N.”
Rita v. State, 663 N.E.2d 1201 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996). “I.C. § 9-26-1-8. [5] Our conclusion that the amendment here was permissible is twofold.”
Allen v. State, 719 N.E.2d 815 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). “Code § 9-26-1-1 (the offense is a class C felony when the accident involves death under Ind. Code § 9-26-1-8 (2)). . Ind. Code § 35 — 42—2—2(c)(1) (inflicting serious bodily injury).”
Nw. Towing & Recovery v. State, 919 N.E.2d 601 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). “Ind.Code § 9-26-1-8. 3 . Ind.Code § 35-44-3-4(a)(3).”
McGinity v. State, 824 N.E.2d 784 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). “See Ind.Code § 9-26-1-8(a) (explaining that it is a crime to fail to stop in a motor vehicle after causing injury to a person); Ind.”
— Ind. Code § 9-26-1-8(2) — 1 case
Allen v. State, 719 N.E.2d 815 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). “Code § 9-26-1-1 (the offense is a class C felony when the accident involves death under Ind. Code § 9-26-1-8 (2)). . Ind. Code § 35 — 42—2—2(c)(1) (inflicting serious bodily injury).”
— Ind. Code § 9-26-1-8(a) — 4 cases
McGinity v. State, 824 N.E.2d 784 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). “See Ind.Code § 9-26-1-8(a) (explaining that it is a crime to fail to stop in a motor vehicle after causing injury to a person); Ind.”
JPB v. State, 705 N.E.2d 1075 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999).
Buck Gleason v. State of Indiana (Ind. Ct. App. 2012).
J.P.B. v. State of Indiana (Ind. 1998).
— Ind. Code § 9-26-1-8(a)(1) — 1 case
Katie L. Miller v. State of Indiana (Ind. Ct. App. 2014).
— Ind. Code § 9-26-1-8(a)(2) — 3 cases
Barber v. State, 863 N.E.2d 1199 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). “Ind.Code § 9-26-1-8(a)(2). 4 . Because Barber committed his offenses before the 2005 amendments to the sentencing statutes, we operate under the former presumptive scheme.”
Abney v. State, 811 N.E.2d 415 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). “Ind.Code § 9-26-1-8(a)(2) (1998). 6 . A chemical test "means an analysis of a person's blood, breath, urine, or other bodily *420 substance for the determination of the presence of alcohol, a controlled substance, or a drug.”
Barton v. State, 936 N.E.2d 842 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). “Ind.Code § 9-26-1-8; Barber v. State, 863 N.”
— Ind. Code § 9-26-1-8(a)(3) — 1 case
Jacoby Sanders v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2016).
— Ind. Code § 9-26-1-8(b) — 1 case
Bass v. State, 797 N.E.2d 303 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.