Iowa Code
Iowa Code § 321J.14 (2026)
Judicial review
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Judicial review of an action of the department may be sought in accordance with the terms of the Iowa administrative procedure Act, chapter 17A. Notwithstanding the terms of that chapter, a petition for judicial review may be filed in the district court in the county where the alleged events occurred or in the county in which the administrative hearing was held. 86 Acts, ch 1220, §14 Referred to in §321J.13
\nNotes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1988–2014 · leading case: Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., Motor Veh. Div., 801 N.W.2d 590 (Iowa 2011).
Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., Motor Veh. Div., 801 N.W.2d 590 (Iowa 2011). “See Iowa Code § 321J.14; Iowa Admin. Code r. 761 — 620.”
Teresa Karen Bearinger v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., Motor Veh. Div., 844 N.W.2d 104 (Iowa 2014). “2d 62, 64 (Iowa 2002); see also Iowa Code § 321J.14. “The district court acts in an appellate capacity to correct errors of law on the part of an agency.”
Ludtke v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., Motor Veh. Div., 646 N.W.2d 62 (Iowa 2002). “See Iowa Code § 321J.14; Reed v. Iowa Dep’t of Transp.”
Ferguson v. State, Dep't of Transp., Motor Veh. Div., 424 N.W.2d 464 (Iowa 1988). “2d 625, 627 (Iowa 1987); Iowa Code §§ 321J.14, 17A.20 (1987). The burden is on the petitioner to demonstrate compliance with all lawful requirements for the retention of the license.”
Gaskey v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., Motor Veh. Div., 537 N.W.2d 695 (Iowa 1995). “Iowa Code § 321J.14. The district court reversed the DOT’s decision.”
Peterson v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., 508 N.W.2d 689 (Iowa 1993). “Iowa Code § 321J.14. Our review on appeal from the district court is for the correction of errors at law.”
Munson v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., Motor Veh. Div., 513 N.W.2d 722 (Iowa 1994). “§ 321J.14. The court found sufficient facts to support the finding that the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to believe Munson had been operating his motor vehicle in violation of Iowa Code section 321J.”
Krueger v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., 493 N.W.2d 844 (Iowa 1992). “Despite the presence of a statutory, rather than a constitutional, exclusionary rule grounded in Iowa Code section 321J.14(4) (1991), we reaffirmed the clear language of Westendorf , holding that lack of probable cause to make an investigatory stop of a motor vehicle did not…”
Zenor v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., Motor Veh. Div., 558 N.W.2d 427 (Iowa Ct. App. 1996). “Section 321J.14 provides for judicial review of an action of the Department of Transportation in accordance with Iowa Code chapter 17A.”
Lee v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., Motor Veh. Div., 693 N.W.2d 342 (Iowa 2005). “§ 321J.14 (2003). On appeal, we apply the standards of chapter 17A to determine whether the conclusions we reach are the same as those of the district court.”
Bankson v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., Motor Veh. Div., 444 N.W.2d 515 (Iowa Ct. App. 1989). “Iowa Code §§ 321J.14,17A.20 *516 (1987). The burden is on the petitioner to demonstrate compliance with all lawful requirements for the retention of the license.”
— Iowa Code § 321J.14(4) — 1 case
Krueger v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., 493 N.W.2d 844 (Iowa 1992). “Despite the presence of a statutory, rather than a constitutional, exclusionary rule grounded in Iowa Code section 321J.14(4) (1991), we reaffirmed the clear language of Westendorf , holding that lack of probable cause to make an investigatory stop of a motor vehicle did not…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.