Iowa Code
Iowa Code § 368.6 (2026)
Intent
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
It is the intent of the general assembly to provide an annexation approval procedure which gives due consideration to the wishes of the residents of territory to be annexed, and to the interests of the residents of all territories affected by an annexation. The general assembly presumes that a voluntary annexation of territory more closely reflects the wishes of the residents of territory to be annexed, and, therefore, intends that the annexation approval procedure include a presumption of validity for voluntary annexation approval. 91 Acts, ch 250, §2
\nNotes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1958–2025 · leading case: Pruss v. Cedar Rapids/Hiawatha Annexation Special Local Comm., 687 N.W.2d 275 (Iowa 2004).
Pruss v. Cedar Rapids/Hiawatha Annexation Special Local Comm., 687 N.W.2d 275 (Iowa 2004). “” Iowa Code § 368.6 . The legislature expressly assumed “a voluntary annexation of territory more closely reflects the wishes of the residents of territory to be annexed.”
Hawkeye Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment of City of Algona, 356 N.W.2d 544 (Iowa 1984). “The General Assembly subsequently repealed the long list of city powers in section 368.6 and substituted general home rule power in present section 364.”
City of Waukee v. City Dev. Bd., 590 N.W.2d 712 (Iowa 1999). “The district court cites as its support Iowa Code section 368.6, which states: It is the intent of the general assembly to provide an annexation approval procedure which gives due consideration to the wishes of the residents of territory to be annexed, and to the interests of…”
City of Hiawatha v. City Dev. Bd., 609 N.W.2d 496 (Iowa 2000). “See Iowa Code § 368.6 . The presumption of validity of voluntary annexations states: It is the intent of the general assembly to provide an annexation approval procedure which gives due consideration to the wishes of the residents of territory to be annexed, and to the interests…”
City of Hiawatha v. City Dev. Bd., 609 N.W.2d 532 (Iowa 2000). “Iowa Code section 368.6 expresses the intent of the legislature in this language: It is the intent of the general assembly to provide an annexation approval procedure which gives due consideration to the wishes of the residents of territory to be annexed, and to the interests of…”
Gorman v. City Dev. Bd., 565 N.W.2d 607 (Iowa 1997). “Iowa Code § 368.6 . All applications for voluntary annexation must be approved by resolution of the city council that receives the application.”
Cole v. City of Osceola, 179 N.W.2d 524 (Iowa 1970). “Defendants in written argument dwell on the provisions of section 368.6 which is concerned with regulating and licensing certain businesses and occupations.”
City of Asbury v. Iowa City Dev. Bd., 723 N.W.2d 188 (Iowa 2006). “We now consider whether Dubuque’s efforts were proper. B. Section 368.7(3) and 80/20 Voluntary Annexations Section 368.”
City of Mason City v. Zerble, 93 N.W.2d 94 (Iowa 1958). “Section 368.6 gives them power to “regulate and license” hotels,- engineers, peddlers, billboards, and sales.”
Anderson v. City Dev. Bd. of the Iowa, 631 N.W.2d 671 (Iowa 2001). “§ 368.6. The record contains no evidence that the lack of the second notice to the Board, if indeed one was not provided, substantially affected the validity of the agreement.”
City of Dubuque v. City Dev. Bd. (Iowa Ct. App. 2025). “” See Iowa Code § 368.6 (2023) (expressly providing “a presumption of validity for voluntary annexation approval”).”
City Of Asbury, Iowa Vs. The Iowa City Dev. Bd. (Iowa 2006). “We now consider whether Dubuque’s efforts were proper. B. Section 368.”
— Iowa Code § 368.6(4) — 1 case
Hawkeye Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment of City of Algona, 356 N.W.2d 544 (Iowa 1984). “The General Assembly subsequently repealed the long list of city powers in section 368.6 and substituted general home rule power in present section 364.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.