Iowa Code » Chapter 479B — HAZARDOUS LIQUID PIPELINES
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 479B.9 (2026)

Final order — condition

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The commission may grant a permit in whole or in part upon terms, conditions, and restrictions as to location and route as it determines to be just and proper. A permit shall not be granted to a pipeline company unless the commission determines that the proposed services will promote the public convenience and necessity. 95 Acts, ch 192, §36; 2024 Acts, ch 1170, §369

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2019–2019 · leading case: Keith Puntenney, Laverne I. Johnson, Richard R. Lamb, Marian D. Johnson, Nw. Iowa Landowners Ass'n, Iowa Farmland Owners Ass'n, Inc., & the Sierra Club Iowa Chapter v. Iowa Utils. Bd., & Off. of Consum. Advocate & The Main Coalition, & Dakota Access, LLC, 928 N.W.2d 829 (Iowa 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Keith Puntenney, Laverne I. Johnson, Richard R. Lamb, Marian D. Johnson, Nw. Iowa Landowners Ass'n, Iowa Farmland Owners Ass'n, Inc., & the Sierra Club Iowa Chapter v. Iowa Utils. Bd., & Off. of Consum. Advocate & The Main Coalition, & Dakota Access, LLC, 928 N.W.2d 829 (Iowa 2019). · cites it 23× “They contended the pipeline did not serve the “public convenience and necessity” as required by law, see Iowa Code § 479B.9 (2016); did not meet the statutory standard required for a taking of agricultural land, see id.”
Keith Puntenney, Laverne I. Johnson, Richard R. Lamb, Marian D. Johnson, Nw. Iowa Landowners Ass'n, Iowa Farmland Owners Ass'n, Inc., & the Sierra Club Iowa Chapter v. Iowa Utils. Bd., & Off. of Consum. Advocate & The Main Coalition, & Dakota Access, LLC (Iowa 2019). · cites it 11× “They contended the pipeline did not serve the “public convenience and necessity” as required by law, see Iowa Code § 479B.9 (2016); did not meet the statutory standard required for a taking of agricultural land, see id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.