Iowa Code § 554.9625 (2026)
Remedies for secured party’s failure to comply with Article
1. Judicial orders concerning noncompliance. If it is established that a secured party is not proceeding in accordance with this Article, a court may order or restrain collection, enforcement, or disposition of collateral on appropriate terms and conditions.
2. Damages for noncompliance. Subject to subsections 3, 4, and 6, a person is liable for damages in the amount of any loss caused by a failure to comply with this Article. Loss caused by a failure to comply may include loss resulting from the debtor’s inability to obtain, or increased costs of, alternative financing.
3. Persons entitled to recover damages — statutory damages if collateral is consumer goods. Except as otherwise provided in section 554.9628:
a. a person that, at the time of the failure, was a debtor, was an obligor, or held a security interest in or other lien on the collateral may recover damages under subsection 2 for its loss; and
b. if the collateral is consumer goods, a person that was a debtor or a secondary obligor at the time a secured party failed to comply with this part may recover for that failure in any event an amount not less than the credit service charge plus ten percent of the principal amount of the obligation or the time-price differential plus ten percent of the cash price.
4. Recovery when deficiency eliminated or reduced. A debtor whose deficiency is eliminated under section 554.9626 may recover damages for the loss of any surplus. However, a debtor or secondary obligor whose deficiency is eliminated or reduced under section 554.9626 may not otherwise recover under subsection 2 for noncompliance with the provisions of this part relating to collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance.
5. Statutory damages — noncompliance with specified provisions. In addition to any damages recoverable under subsection 2, the debtor, consumer obligor, or person named as a debtor in a filed record, as applicable, may recover five hundred dollars in each case from a person that:
a. fails to comply with section 554.9208;
b. fails to comply with section 554.9209;
c. files a record that the person is not entitled to file under section 554.9509, subsection 1;
d. fails to cause the secured party of record to file or send a termination statement as required by section 554.9513, subsection 1 or 3;
e. fails to comply with section 554.9616, subsection 2, paragraph “a”, and whose failure is part of a pattern, or consistent with a practice, of noncompliance; or
f. fails to comply with section 554.9616, subsection 2, paragraph “b”.
6. Statutory damages — noncompliance with section 554.9210. A debtor or consumer obligor may recover damages under subsection 2 and, in addition, five hundred dollars in each case from a person that, without reasonable cause, fails to comply with a request under section 554.9210. A recipient of a request under section 554.9210 which never claimed an interest in the collateral or obligations that are the subject of a request under that section has a reasonable excuse for failure to comply with the request within the meaning of this subsection.
7. Limitation of security interest — noncompliance with section 554.9210. If a secured party fails to comply with a request regarding a list of collateral or a statement of account under section 554.9210, the secured party may claim a security interest only as shown in the list or statement included in the request as against a person that is reasonably misled by the failure. 2000 Acts, ch 1149, §123, 187; 2012 Acts, ch 1052, §23, 37 Referred to in §554.9513A, 554.9602, 554.9628\n\n 554.9626 Action in which deficiency or surplus is in issue.
1. Applicable rules if amount of deficiency or surplus in issue. In an action arising from\n\nTue Dec 09 22:02:43 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 554 (108, 4) §554.9626, UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE 224\n\na transaction, other than a consumer transaction, in which the amount of a deficiency or surplus is in issue, the following rules apply:
a. a secured party need not prove compliance with the provisions of this part relating to collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance unless the debtor or a secondary obligor places the secured party’s compliance in issue.
b. if the secured party’s compliance is placed in issue, the secured party has the burden of establishing that the collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance was conducted in accordance with this part.
c. except as otherwise provided in section 554.9628, if a secured party fails to prove that the collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance was conducted in accordance with the provisions of this part relating to collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance, the liability of a debtor or a secondary obligor for a deficiency is limited to an amount by which the sum of the secured obligation, expenses, and attorney’s fees exceeds the greater of:
(1) the proceeds of the collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance; or
(2) the amount of proceeds that would have been realized had the noncomplying secured party proceeded in accordance with the provisions of this part relating to collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance.
d. for purposes of paragraph “c”, subparagraph (2), the amount of proceeds that would have been realized is equal to the sum of the secured obligation, expenses, and attorney’s fees unless the secured party proves that the amount is less than that sum.
e. if a deficiency or surplus is calculated under section 554.9615, subsection 6, the debtor or obligor has the burden of establishing that the amount of proceeds of the disposition is significantly below the range of prices that a complying disposition to a person other than the secured party, a person related to the secured party, or a secondary obligor would have brought.
2. Nonconsumer transactions — no inference. The limitation of the rules in subsection 1 to transactions other than consumer transactions is intended to leave to the court the determination of the proper rules in consumer transactions. The court may not infer from that limitation the nature of the proper rule in consumer transactions and may continue to apply established approaches. 2000 Acts, ch 1149, §124, 187 Referred to in §554.9602, 554.9625 \n